Google Antigravity

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•13 reviews•

1K followers

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•13 reviews•

1K followers

Visit website

AI Coding Agents

•

AI Code Editors

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

Google Antigravity Reviews

The community submitted 13 reviews to tell us what they like about Google Antigravity, what Google Antigravity can do better, and more.

4.8

Based on 13 reviews

Review Google Antigravity?

Reviewers broadly see Google Antigravity as a strong productivity tool that explains its reasoning well, helps with planning and walkthroughs, and feels especially useful for complex coding work like infra and APIs. Several say it is more practical than Copilot or Cursor for understanding why things happen, not just generating code. Makers of

Socra

and

PromptURLs

also praise it for big-feature design and parallel agent workflows. The main complaints are UI bugs, weak onboarding, limits or weaker fallback models, and uneven handling of larger multi-file projects.

+10

Summarized with AI

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

used

Google Antigravity

to build PromptURLs

•8 reviews

Useful for running and monitoring multiple coding agents in parallel, which pairs well with the other tools in the stack.

Alternatives Considered

Report

1 view20d ago

used

Google Antigravity

to build Window View instead of Cursor, Claude Code

•2 reviews

Antigravity with Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 helped me build a lot of Window View! Antigravity's good support for image input and Gemini's strong vision capabilities were super useful due to the visualization nature of this project.

Alternatives Considered

Cursor

Claude Code

Report

2 views8d ago

•2 reviews

What's great

I tried AntiGravity and am very satisfied, as it allowed me to be highly productive and tackle complex tasks efficiently. I am also very grateful to the team for making this possible, and I’m excited for future updates and what’s to come. 😊

What needs improvement

I think the biggest potential for improvement probably lies in enhancing the Agents. I’m not currently using the Agent Manager (CTRL + E), because, to be honest, I usually handle one task at a time, as the tasks are very complex and need to be reviewed and understood by me.

vs Alternatives

Because it integrates Gemini3 in a free tier.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

64 views4mo ago

•1 review

What's great

It actually explains what’s going on, not just writes code.

I used it while working on Terraform + AWS, and it broke down the full flow (API → Lambda) in a way that just made sense
Saves time switching between docs and code
Feels fast and gives straight answers without over-explaining
Helpful when you’re trying to understand why something is happening, not just fix it

What needs improvement

Doesn’t always handle bigger projects across multiple files that well
Could give more real-world edge case examples
Sometimes I just want a shorter answer, a bit more control there would help

vs Alternatives

I tried GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Amazon Q.

Copilot is good for suggestions, but not great at explaining things
Cursor is solid, but felt more general
Amazon Q is useful for AWS, but sometimes too long or not very clear

I went with Antigravity because it felt more practical for what I was doing (infra + APIs).

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

1 view1d ago

1 2