Google Antigravity

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•11 reviews•

1K followers

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•11 reviews•

1K followers

AI Coding Agents

•

AI Code Editors

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

Google Antigravity Reviews

The community submitted 11 reviews to tell us what they like about Google Antigravity, what Google Antigravity can do better, and more.

4.8

Based on 11 reviews

Review Google Antigravity?

Reviews praise strong multi-agent workflows, clear implementation plans, and productivity gains, with users noting it feels like a capable teammate. Minor knocks include UI quirks, brief trial limits, and occasional fallback to weaker models; polish and model reliability are recurring asks. From the makers of

,

, and

, founders highlight effective parallel agent monitoring, big-feature design help, and solid overall results. Power users value deep planning, skills that handle email/calendar, and smooth walkthroughs; several compare favorably against Cursor and Claude Code.

+8

Summarized with AI

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

What's great

Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.

What needs improvement

Mostly needs some bugfixes and UI polish. E.g. sometimes one of the panels obscures an Accept/Reject button, so it's hard to see the app is waiting for user input. And when allowing certain commands, I haven't been able to make this stick yet. There's an allowlist for commands in the settings, but this doesn't seem to work for me.

vs Alternatives

Cursor never quite resonated with me, but I need to give it another shot. Claude Code is great with Opus 4.5, but way too expensive. Antigravity is very close to Claude Code, and as a paid Google AI Pro subscriber I haven't bumped into any limits yet. I actually like Copilot quite a bit as well.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

84 views3mo ago

What's great

I tried AntiGravity and am very satisfied, as it allowed me to be highly productive and tackle complex tasks efficiently. I am also very grateful to the team for making this possible, and I’m excited for future updates and what’s to come. 😊

What needs improvement

I think the biggest potential for improvement probably lies in enhancing the Agents. I’m not currently using the Agent Manager (CTRL + E), because, to be honest, I usually handle one task at a time, as the tasks are very complex and need to be reviewed and understood by me.

vs Alternatives

Because it integrates Gemini3 in a free tier.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

63 views3mo ago

What's great

For a very long time I had all these ideas that I couldn't act on. Antigravity has allowed me to just explore and create again, which is a wonderful feeling. The recent addition of skills has exploded my workflow productivity, it literally handles my inbox and calendar for me now. I've been a Google fanboy for a long time and I love what they're doing here.

What needs improvement

Still has some minor UI quirks and small bugs as expected with a new tool, but nothing that stops the workflow. I’m excited to see more built-in skills added.

vs Alternatives

I’ve used Cursor and Claude Code extensively, but they always felt like advanced autocomplete. I chose Antigravity because it bridges the gap between "writing code" and "getting things done." The autonomous skills, handling my real-world emails, calendar, and project setup, along with the deep planning it applies to project architecture, make it the only tool that actually feels like a teammate instead of just a text editor.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

67 views2mo ago

Product Hunt

What's great

The agent workflow seemed like a meaningful improvement over Cursor. It was easy to follow the agent's code exploration and "though process". The review workflow made it feel very natural to iterate on the agent's proposed solution.

What needs improvement

The onboarding/trial felt weak somehow. I ran out of free-usage fairly quickly, and it fell over onto weaker models. I wasn't prompted to upgrade. For a new product, I'd expect to be able to trial it fully-featured, and then decide whether to upgrade.

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

vs Alternatives

The most important thing is going to be model accuracy. It's worth giving up on UX for better code generation.

In that sense, I actually stalled. Antigravity had momentum, but then stalled and failed over to weaker models. I had to get back to work, so I switched back to Cursor + Claude Code.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Report

296 views3mo ago

used

Google Antigravity

to build Launch Shots

Google Antigravity deserves a massive shoutout. I’ve been an AI-accelerated developer since GitHub Copilot launched, but this… this feels like another level. It just gets what I’m trying to build. The speed, the quality, the intuition — I genuinely haven’t had a better experience anywhere else. Without Antigravity, LaunchShots wouldn’t have shipped this fast.

Report

30 views3mo ago

Product Hunt

What's great

The agent workflow seemed like a meaningful improvement over Cursor. It was easy to follow the agent's code exploration and "though process". The review workflow made it feel very natural to iterate on the agent's proposed solution.

What needs improvement

The onboarding/trial felt weak somehow. I ran out of free-usage fairly quickly, and it fell over onto weaker models. I wasn't prompted to upgrade. For a new product, I'd expect to be able to trial it fully-featured, and then decide whether to upgrade.

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

vs Alternatives

The most important thing is going to be model accuracy. It's worth giving up on UX for better code generation.

In that sense, I actually stalled. Antigravity had momentum, but then stalled and failed over to weaker models. I had to get back to work, so I switched back to Cursor + Claude Code.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Report

296 views3mo ago