TrackLens is a tool that pulls your Epics and lets you manage them locally with a real-time Gantt view. Tech Stack: React 19, Tailwind, Node.js (Proxy). Key highlights: 🚀 Local-first architecture with instant performance 📅 Smart, non-destructive date autogeneration 🧠 Built-in RAG risk intelligence 🧪 Safe what-if planning with local edits 🌗 Dark and light themes 🔒 Privacy-first, no vendor lock-in Stop fighting Jira’s UI. Keep the database. Upgrade the view.
I have been building a Jira Epic planning dashboard recently, and it forced me to question a lot of assumptions about how teams plan and track epics in Jira. I wanted to open this up for discussion because I suspect many teams run into the same issues.
Here are a few questions and observations I would love input on:
I just went through my first Product Hunt launch with TrackLens, and one thing I didn t fully appreciate before doing it was how unpredictable the outcome really is.
I ve seen launches where founders did everything by the book Strong pre-launch Big networks Clear positioning
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for JIRA Epic Planning Dashboard
Unblocked — Get AI agents to generate code that fits your system.
Get AI agents to generate code that fits your system.
Promoted
Maker
📌
The Problem:
JIRA is the database, not the view. We all know the pain. You’re a Product Manager or Technical Lead managing complex roadmaps. JIRA is your source of truth, but visualizing that truth is a nightmare. The native roadmaps are clunky, slow to load, and often require expensive plugins just to see a simple timeline. You end up exporting data to Excel or PowerPoint just to show stakeholders "where we are," essentially killing the real-time nature of your data.
Enter TrackLens. TrackLens isn't a JIRA replacement—it's a JIRA accelerator. It’s a dedicated, local-first application that sits on top of your existing JIRA instance to give you instant, interactive Gantt charts without the bloat.
What makes TrackLens different?
1. Zero-Latency, Local-First Architecture Most JIRA plugins run on Atlassian's servers, which means every click waits for a server round-trip. TrackLens is different. It pulls your legitimate JIRA data into your browser’s local storage. This means interacting with the Gantt chart—zooming, filtering, expanding epics—is instant (60fps). You can manipulate your roadmap at the speed of thought, not the speed of your internet connection. But unlike a static CSV export, TrackLens maintains a live link to JIRA to push changes back when you decide.
2. Smart Date Autogeneration One of the biggest hurdles in Gantt charting is missing data. If an Epic doesn’t have a start or end date in JIRA, most tools just hide it. TrackLens uses a smart inference engine. If dates are missing, it looks at the child issues (Stories, Tasks) to calculate reasonable fallback dates based on their sprint assignments or due dates. This ensures your roadmap never has "invisible" work.
3. Privacy & Security by Design TrackLens is "Bring Your Own Key." We don't have a database. We don't store your proprietary roadmap data on our servers. The application acts as a secure proxy between your browser and the JIRA API. Your data lives in your browser and your JIRA instance—nowhere else. This makes it incredibly easy to get approval from IT security teams who are wary of third-party SaaS tools ingesting sensitivity project data.
4. "RAG" Health at a Glance Stop guessing which projects are in trouble. TrackLens automatically calculates a Red-Amber-Green (RAG) status for every Epic based on its progress versus its due date/ETA. You can instantly spot that an Epic is 40% complete but the deadline is tomorrow (Red), or that you're ahead of schedule (Green), without digging into individual tickets.
Key Features Summary:
🚀 BFF Pattern: Backend-for-Frontend proxy ensures CORS-free, secure connections.
🌗 Theming: Beautiful Dark and Light modes (because roadmapping happens late at night too).
🔍 Smart Filters: Filter by "At Risk" projects instantly.
🔒 No Vendor Lock-in: It's open-source. Fork it, customize it, own it.
I just went through my first Product Hunt launch with TrackLens, and one thing I didn’t fully appreciate before doing it was how unpredictable the outcome really is.
I’ve seen launches where founders did everything “by the book” Strong pre-launch Big networks Clear positioning
…and still ended up somewhere mid-pack.
On the other hand, I launched TrackLens without a huge following, mostly by talking openly about the problem I was solving and engaging in discussions before and after launch. The response was encouraging, but it still made me question how much of Product Hunt success is actually controllable.
It feels like some combination of:
Timing
Who happens to be online that day
Community momentum
And yes, a bit of luck
What surprised me most wasn’t the ranking, but the conversations. People cared less about the polish and more about why the product existed and what problem it genuinely tried to solve.
For those who’ve launched before, I’d really love to learn from you:
• What surprised you the most after your launch? • What actually moved the needle for you? • What would you focus on if you were launching again today?
Trying to learn from the experience and get better at this, not just chase numbers.
Report
Maker
Quick note for anyone curious 👇
TrackLens is currently completely free to use, so feel free to try it out and explore the features. No pressure, no commitment.
If you run into any issues, bugs, or things that feel confusing, please let me know. I’m actively improving it and would genuinely appreciate the feedback.
Happy to help if you get stuck 🙂
Report
Maker
I kept running into this problem where epics had missing or unreliable dates in Jira, so Gantt charts were useless. I ended up building a view-only fallback system.
Please feel free to try it out. Its completely free.
@JIRA Epic Planning Dashboard
I just went through my first Product Hunt launch with TrackLens, and one thing I didn’t fully appreciate before doing it was how unpredictable the outcome really is.
I’ve seen launches where founders did everything “by the book”
Strong pre-launch
Big networks
Clear positioning
…and still ended up somewhere mid-pack.
On the other hand, I launched TrackLens without a huge following, mostly by talking openly about the problem I was solving and engaging in discussions before and after launch. The response was encouraging, but it still made me question how much of Product Hunt success is actually controllable.
It feels like some combination of:
Timing
Who happens to be online that day
Community momentum
And yes, a bit of luck
What surprised me most wasn’t the ranking, but the conversations. People cared less about the polish and more about why the product existed and what problem it genuinely tried to solve.
For those who’ve launched before, I’d really love to learn from you:
• What surprised you the most after your launch?
• What actually moved the needle for you?
• What would you focus on if you were launching again today?
Trying to learn from the experience and get better at this, not just chase numbers.
Quick note for anyone curious 👇
TrackLens is currently completely free to use, so feel free to try it out and explore the features. No pressure, no commitment.
If you run into any issues, bugs, or things that feel confusing, please let me know. I’m actively improving it and would genuinely appreciate the feedback.
Happy to help if you get stuck 🙂
I kept running into this problem where epics had missing or unreliable dates in Jira, so Gantt charts were useless. I ended up building a view-only fallback system.
Please feel free to try it out. Its completely free.
Curious how others solve this.