Launched this week

Jupid
File your taxes with Claude Code
910 followers
File your taxes with Claude Code
910 followers
No matter how powerful LLMs get, they are objectively bad at financial transactions. Context loss, inconsistent categories, no memory between sessions. Jupid fixes the data layer. Connect your bank — it learns your business and every vendor relationship once, then remembers forever. Transactions mapped to IRS Schedule C categories (~96% accuracy). Missed deductions found: $1,249/year average. File your Schedule C in 5 minutes. Works with Claude Code. Free trial + 50% off first 3 months.









Hey, congrats with the launch!
Is it adoptable for different countries? And will it work for me when I’m actively nomading?
@alexey_yurkevich Yes - for sure.
Out of the box, the full filing-ready flow is for the US. But the categorization engine, counterparty enrichment, custom reports, and working with financial data itself are not limited by country.
So if you are nomading, it still works well for keeping your financial data clean and usable. For local filing outside the US, you would still need local tools or a local accountant.
Nice launch! I run a single-member US LLC. Most of my expenses are SaaS subscriptions, a few contractor payments, and the occasional travel. Pretty clean Schedule C. Two questions: (1) How does Jupid handle the personal vs. business split on a single bank account — does it learn which recurring charges are business over time, or do I have to tag everything manually upfront? (2) For a low-volume consulting LLC (~50-100 transactions/month), is there enough signal for the categorization engine to be useful, or does this shine more at higher transaction volumes?
@sergey_kalachev Our topmost goal is eventually make it so you don't need to tag anything manually!
think of working with a real human accountant: sometimes he'll have to ask you questions ("Did you fuel your car here for personal needs or business travel?"), but often, knowing you, your company operations, your history and preferences, he can make this assumption on his own.
That's our target: Jupid should become well-versed in your operations so it'll bother you only when it's necessary and just once.
@sergey_kalachev Great questions, Sergey! First, on personal vs. business — we start with the bank account type. Generally, the account itself sets the pattern for how we treat transactions: business expense or personal. You can always override and mark any personal transaction as business. As for transaction volume — it's really just a matter of tokens our system consumes. The categorization question is most relevant during onboarding, when you're just starting out. After that, transactions naturally become more predictable and typed, and volume doesn't matter much.
Banyan AI Lite
Good luck and happy launch! Question: whoch countries do you cover and how do you make sure results are deterministic, no hallucinations or wrong calculation. You know, you better not fool around with tax authorities 😀
@davitausberlin Great question, Davit! Right now we cover the US for tax filing. As for hallucinations — yes, you have to fight them. We've built a multi-layer supervision system with cross-validation between different models, plus manual review checkpoints. You definitely don't want to mess around with tax authorities 😄
Jupid
@davitausberlin As someone who's seen what happens when you DO fool around with tax authorities... hard agree 😅 That's why we built the validation layer before we built anything else
Banyan AI Lite
@ilya_lee 😀😀 great to hear you are taking care of that problems. And congrats for #1!
AgentQL
If our company already considers using one of the alternatives, like Fondo, how are you different from them? Any highlights/number differences?
@colriot Fondo is a great company. But they still rely heavily on manual work for bookkeeping. Where we excel is the technology — you practically don't need manual work anymore. Out of the box, you get high-quality categorization. Plus you always have instant communication with our AI accountant through any messenger.
Skala
This solves a pain I've been feeling for a while. I dumped my bank CSV into Claude last month and it was great at first, but by the 200th transaction it was categorizing Uber rides as 'Office Supplies.' How does Jupid keep accuracy high across thousands of transactions?
@danilakropotkin Great question! Our innovation is that we don't work with transactions directly — we work with your counterparties. When we understand the background and context of who you're doing business with, assigning the correct category becomes straightforward, because the relationship between your company and the counterparty IS the economic essence of the transaction. That's how we maintain high accuracy across thousands of transactions.
Jupid
@danilakropotkin "Uber rides as Office Supplies" — I'm stealing that for our marketing 😄 But seriously, we've seen Claude categorize the same coffee shop as Meals, then Supplies, then Advertising in the same session. At least it's creative :)
@matt12 Matt, specifically in your case, we can do $50 for two businesses if you don’t have many transactions. It would all be automated, so that’s not a problem at all.
I did all my taxes this year with Claude walking me through the whole process. It was honestly perfect. So seeing someone build a dedicated product around this makes total sense. The messy part was always the data, not the AI itself. Curious how Jupid handles bank connections for EU accounts?
@thenomadcode Great to hear you've been using Claude for taxes! You're right — the messy part was always the data, not the AI itself. For EU bank connections — we work with any CSV exports, so you can just drop your bank statements and we'll handle them. Direct EU bank integrations are on our roadmap.