Morsa Signals gives developer-tool founders and GTM teams practical GTM and SEO/GEO workflows in one place. Find relevant developers for scaled outreach, identify potential first users and early adopters, audit how AI search systems understand your site, and get a first read on competitors worth tracking. Each workflow starts from your actual product and produces a focused, actionable result instead of a generic report or database.
We built Morsa Signals around a recurring problem with developer tools: strong products often struggle to reach the right developers, explain their relevance, and become discoverable through search and AI systems.
Morsa Signals brings together four focused workflows:
🔎 Contact Search Finds relevant developers for teams scaling outreach, explains why each person fits, and suggests a personalized opening angle. https://signals.morsa.io/contact-search
🌱 First Users Helps solo and early-stage devtool founders identify potential early adopters for their first outreach conversations. https://signals.morsa.io/first-users
🤖 AI Visibility Audit Reviews how clearly a devtool website communicates its product to search and AI systems, then generates a ready-to-use prompt for addressing identified gaps. https://signals.morsa.io/audit
Each workflow starts with the actual product, audience, and problem. The goal is a focused, actionable result rather than a generic report or database.
I’d especially value feedback from devtool founders and GTM teams: which problem is most urgent for you, and what would make you trust the result?
@kristina__grits Thanks, Kristina! That’s exactly why we don’t start with a broad, static contact database.
Each search begins with the product, target audience, and problem it solves. We turn that into specific search angles, then match them against public signals such as developer profiles, projects, topics, and recent activity.
Each result includes a clear reason why the person is relevant. We build every list for the specific request and check the available public contact data when preparing it. At this stage, I also review the final results manually while we continue improving the matching.
Growing a developer tool rarely comes down to one isolated problem. Some teams need their first users, others need better outreach data, clearer AI visibility, or a better understanding of their competitive space.
We brought these workflows together because they all start from the same context: the actual product, its audience, and the problem it solves.
If you’re building a developer tool, I’d be interested to know which workflow you would use first and what you would need to trust its results.
Hey folks 🙌🏻 We’re a dev team ourselves, and we built this tool for our own needs first - to find relevant dev customers and boost AI visibility. Excited to share with other dev teams now
Report
Congrats on the launch. I particularly like the AI Visibility score, I think that is a very useful and needed feature.
@jason013 Thanks, Jason! That’s exactly the idea behind it: provide a quick baseline, then explain the specific gaps in positioning, technical readiness, and public footprint behind the score. We’re still refining the analysis, so I’d be curious to hear which part of the audit felt most useful to you.
Hey, I’m Stan from Morsa - we’re building that tool for devtool founders to solve main challenge of any startup - how to find customers.
Please support our launch 🚀
PingMi
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I’m Sergei, co-founder at Morsa.
We built Morsa Signals around a recurring problem with developer tools: strong products often struggle to reach the right developers, explain their relevance, and become discoverable through search and AI systems.
Morsa Signals brings together four focused workflows:
🔎 Contact Search
Finds relevant developers for teams scaling outreach, explains why each person fits, and suggests a personalized opening angle.
https://signals.morsa.io/contact-search
🌱 First Users
Helps solo and early-stage devtool founders identify potential early adopters for their first outreach conversations.
https://signals.morsa.io/first-users
🤖 AI Visibility Audit
Reviews how clearly a devtool website communicates its product to search and AI systems, then generates a ready-to-use prompt for addressing identified gaps.
https://signals.morsa.io/audit
📡 Competitor Tracking
Provides a first read on relevant competitors and the public signals worth monitoring.
https://signals.morsa.io/competitor-tracking
Each workflow starts with the actual product, audience, and problem. The goal is a focused, actionable result rather than a generic report or database.
I’d especially value feedback from devtool founders and GTM teams: which problem is most urgent for you, and what would make you trust the result?
PingMi
PingMi
@sergeipetrov 🚀🚀🚀
Glam AI
PingMi
@kristina__grits Thanks, Kristina! That’s exactly why we don’t start with a broad, static contact database.
Each search begins with the product, target audience, and problem it solves. We turn that into specific search angles, then match them against public signals such as developer profiles, projects, topics, and recent activity.
Each result includes a clear reason why the person is relevant. We build every list for the specific request and check the available public contact data when preparing it. At this stage, I also review the final results manually while we continue improving the matching.
Glam AI
PingMi
One additional thought behind Morsa Signals:
Growing a developer tool rarely comes down to one isolated problem. Some teams need their first users, others need better outreach data, clearer AI visibility, or a better understanding of their competitive space.
We brought these workflows together because they all start from the same context: the actual product, its audience, and the problem it solves.
If you’re building a developer tool, I’d be interested to know which workflow you would use first and what you would need to trust its results.
PingMi
Hey folks 🙌🏻 We’re a dev team ourselves, and we built this tool for our own needs first - to find relevant dev customers and boost AI visibility. Excited to share with other dev teams now
Congrats on the launch. I particularly like the AI Visibility score, I think that is a very useful and needed feature.
PingMi
@jason013 Thanks, Jason! That’s exactly the idea behind it: provide a quick baseline, then explain the specific gaps in positioning, technical readiness, and public footprint behind the score. We’re still refining the analysis, so I’d be curious to hear which part of the audit felt most useful to you.
PingMi
Congrats on the launch! Product looks great 🚀
PingMi
@mshra_ji Nice. Thanks for the feedback!