Bias auditing with remediation — not just tables. | Paritas

Hey Product Hunt — I'm Tyler, founder of Paritas. I built Paritas because the bias auditing market has a gap: legacy consulting firms charge $50K–$150K+ and deliver a PDF via email. AI-native startups offer "audits" while also selling the tools being audited. Neither gives you a clear answer to the question that actually matters: what do I do when the numbers come back wrong? Paritas is the independent alternative: Connect your data — CSV upload or direct ATS integration (Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS, SmartRecruiters, Ashby). Candidate PII is hashed with SHA-256 and never stored. Get a real analysis — Disparate impact analysis across sex, race/ethnicity, and intersectional categories. Four-fifths rule, Fisher's exact test, z-tests, confidence intervals, and Simpson's Paradox detection. Receive a report you can act on — Every finding is classified as PASS, MONITOR, or FLAG, with prioritized remediation recommendations organized into 0–30 day, 30–90 day, and 90–180 day action items. A few things that make us different: - No vendor ties. Paritas has no financial or advisory relationship with any AEDT vendor. We audit tools — we don't sell them. - Published methodology. Our full methodology is public at paritas.ai/methodology. No black boxes. - Permanent reports. Every audit lives at a public URL forever. Archived via Perma.cc. Cannot be altered or deleted by the audited organization. - Multi-jurisdiction. One audit maps to LL144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois AIVAA, EU AI Act, and EEOC guidelines. Pricing starts at $5K/year for a single AEDT audit. Happy to answer any questions about the regulatory landscape or how the analysis works.