QA.tech

Ship faster with AI agents that create and run your QA tests

4.3•7 reviews•

830 followers

Ship faster with AI agents that create and run your QA tests

4.3•7 reviews•

830 followers

Visit website

Testing and QA software

•

AI Infrastructure Tools

QA.tech uses AI agents to replicate human QA testers, scanning web apps to understand functionality and generate complete test suites. Tests can be run automatically on every release, on a schedule, or manually, ensuring scalable and reliable quality assurance

QA.tech Reviews

The community submitted 7 reviews to tell us what they like about QA.tech, what QA.tech can do better, and more.

4.3

Based on 7 reviews

Review QA.tech?

Reviews praise QA.tech for quickly mapping app workflows, generating useful test suites, and catching bugs that traditional scripts miss. Users highlight intuitive setup, live agent interactions that ease fine-tuning, and faster regression cycles that help teams ship with confidence. Several note dependable coverage and clear bug reports. Critiques focus on performance lag and onboarding friction, with one serious callout about plaintext password exposure that needs urgent remediation. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, especially for startups and fast-moving teams, provided security and speed improve.

Summarized with AI

Pros

AI automation (2)

reduces manual testing (2)

simplifies repetitive testing (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (2)

Other Reviews (5)

View all

•1 review

QA.tech seems like a great tool to reduce manual testing efforts, simplify repetitive testing, and provide a one-stop solution for both automation and manual testing. Its continuous testing capabilities can help identify production bugs faster and more efficiently. Adding integrations with tools would make it even more powerful.

What's great

continuous testing (1)reduces manual testing (2)simplifies repetitive testing (2)manual testing support (1)

Report

6 views1yr ago

QA.tech

Hi Adil! Thanks for the nice words! We are adding integrations continously based on customer feedback and support some simpler ones for now like GH actions, Slack, Linear etc. Are there any specific integrations you would like to see in the product?

Report

1yr ago

QA.tech

Thanks Adil, this is really something we learnt from building tons of products and hopefully people can see this value!

Report

1yr ago

•1 review

We signed up on QA.tech in August earlier this year and felt that they made it really intuitive to start building out automated tests! I have been following QA.tech's journey for a while now, I think they're onto something!

What's great

innovative platform (1)intuitive setup (1)

Report

3 views1yr ago

QA.tech

So happy that we can make testing easier for you!

Report

1yr ago

•7 reviews

This is quite a promising product, I am using it to test a product we built last year and couple of mins in, I am already quite impressed and I can see myself using it in testing future products.

Report

1 view4mo ago

•1 review

I love the fact that we're now putting AI to offload us from doing tedious, manual work. Did it find bugs in my app? Yes, instantly.

What's great

time-saving (1)AI automation (2)fast feedback (1)reduces manual testing (2)simplifies repetitive testing (2)

Report

1 view4mo ago

•1 review

I register account for trail, however, it stopped me from execute TCs and force me to book the call. I could not tried to see how it work first.

What needs improvement

trial limitations (1)

Report

1 view9mo ago

•1 review

Feedback: I noticed a serious security concern — it seems that users’ passwords are being stored in plain text. After signing up, I tried to QA one of my products, and your AI chat rendered a login screen showing my username and password, presumably because it needed access to the product I was testing. This is a major security issue and should be addressed immediately. Passwords should never be stored or exposed in plain text under any circumstance.

Report

6 views4mo ago

QA.tech

AI agents (transformer LLMs) use plain text indeed, so it makes sense you've seen your credential exposed.
We recommend our users create dedicated accounts for AI agents or hide their dev/staging under SSH tunnels: https://docs.qa.tech/core-concepts/configs

But ideally you're right, we should make a way for our AI agent to use credentials in a more secure way.

Report

4mo ago

QA.tech

Thanks for checking us out and thanks for the feedback! We will make sure to make it clearer that no sensitive users or passwords should be used as config for your test cases.

The thing is that it's really hard to keep the password safe as there's network logs, console logs, browser states, and LLM calls involved so we have chosen to store and show as plain text to be transparent about that no sensitive configs should be added.

Report

4mo ago

QA.tech

•2 reviews

I started using QA.tech for the regression testing of my AI chat app and was so surprised QA.tech AI was able to chat to my app's AI characters to verify my app worked. Long story short, i joined QA.tech as an employee straight into the PH launch 🌞 So now when you start using QA.tech - I'll help you adopt QA.tech's agentic AI for your products. Cannot be happier! Hope you all find it as useful and life-changing as i did

What's great

professional team (1)excellent customer support (1)automation features (1)AI automation (2)

Report

2 views4mo ago