Launching today

Radaric

Launching today

AI feed reader that learns your editorial taste

19 followers

AI feed reader that learns your editorial taste

19 followers

Visit website

News

•

Bring RSS, Telegram, X and YouTube into a feed that learns from what you approve, reject and explain. Repeating coverage of the same event goes into one story with original links. Built by a newsletter editor. From $9/mo.

Payment Required

Launch tags:Productivity•News•Artificial Intelligence

Launch Team / Built With

Bookov

Maker

📌

Hey Product Hunt, I’m Kirill. I edit Zhurnalus, a weekly design digest with 500+ issues since 2016. Finding material for it means going through hundreds of posts across feeds and channels. After doing that for years, I built a tool to help with my own curation. That tool became Radaric. I’ve spent nearly a year turning it from something I used myself into a public product. The part I care about most is being able to teach the filter. A topic like “design” is a starting point, but it doesn’t capture an editor’s taste. A practical case study, a minor product update and a piece of corporate PR can all match the same keywords. I want to be able to explain which one belongs in my digest, and why. In Radaric, you describe what matters in plain language. Then you approve or reject posts and, when it helps, add a reason. That feedback gives the AI context for future decisions. You can see its reasoning and revisit what it filtered out. It brings together RSS, Telegram, including private channels, and YouTube. Twitter/X is available on Pro. When several sources cover the same event, Radaric groups the posts into one story and keeps the original links attached. If you edit a newsletter, curate a digest or follow an industry for your work, I’d love to hear how this fits the way you read. The filter needs your input; it won’t know your taste on day one. Lite is $9/month. Pro is $59/month and adds X. There’s a 30-day money-back guarantee, and you can reach me directly at kirill@radaric.pro. What’s a distinction you make when choosing what to read that a keyword filter never gets right? — Kirill

Report

12h ago

Mailwarm

Being able to explain why you rejected a post, not just thumbs down, is the part I'd use most. After 500+ issues of Zhurnalus, how many approve/reject decisions did it take before the filter started matching your taste?

Report

20m ago

Bookov

Maker

📌

Report

12h ago

Mailwarm

Report

20m ago