Ragent — AI Requirements Agent
Ship 3x faster with perfect backlogs
13 followers
Ship 3x faster with perfect backlogs
13 followers
Stop wasting 4–8+ hours per week writing Jira tickets. Turn messy requirements into perfect backlogs through conversatio. Start focusing more on strategy and innovation. Ragent is your AI Requirements Partner that transforms this process: 🧠 Write your requirements in natural language ❓ Answer smart clarifying questions to fill the gap (optional) ✅ Review a complete backlog with Epics, Stories, Tasks, and acceptance criteria 🚀 Export to Jira with one click (relationships preserved)
Free Options
Launch Team / Built With
Congrats on the launch!
The idea of an AI-native requirements agent is very compelling.
I’m curious about flexibility how customisable is the output? Can teams enforce their own user story templates, DoR/DoD definitions, or naming conventions?
For many product teams, alignment with internal standards is critical for adoption — would love to understand how deeply Ragent can adapt to existing workflows.
@andriana_nedelco Thank you so much. You’re right that alignment with internal standards is what makes or breaks adoption.
Ragent outputs a consistent structure (epic → story → task, “As a… I want… so that”, acceptance criteria) and, when you’re connected to Jira, follows your project’s issue types and hierarchy. You can also steer the output in your conversation (e.g. “use Gherkin for AC” or “exactly 3 epics”) and the AI will respect that. This is something we are still working on to ensure it can fully adapt to each organisation's nuances.
Where we’re going: Custom user-story templates, DoR/DoD definitions, and naming conventions at the team or org level are exactly the kind of flexibility we’re building toward. We’re not there yet for full “upload your template, but it’s a priority.
I’d love to understand what your teams use today (e.g. Confluence templates, Jira descriptions, naming rules). Once you try it, and if you’re up for a short call, your input can directly shape how we roll out that deeper customisation.
Does RAGENT adapt to different frameworks (Scrum vs Kanban vs SAFe), or is it optimized primarily for Scrum teams?
@ionel_bacioi right now Ragent generates Epic, Story, and Task only. We don’t yet support Features or Initiatives, so we’re effectively supporting teams that work with that hierarchy (i.e. Scrum). Saying this you can still generate inidividual Stories and Tasks for your Kanban board in minutes.
We’re planning to support more ways of working over time (including other frameworks and terminology). I'm happy to go into more detail if helpful.
How well does Ragent integrate with existing Jira workflows? Can it update existing epics/stories or only create new ones?
@embedmind Thanks for asking; here’s how it works today:
Fitting into your Jira workflow
Ragent plugs into your existing Jira setup. You connect via Jira Cloud OAuth and choose the project and space you want. When you export, we create issues in that project with your issue types (Epic, Story, Task/Subtask), and respect your project’s fields (priority, assignee, labels, due date, fix version, etc.). Epic → Story → Task hierarchy is preserved, and we create issue links between related items. Comments and attachments from Ragent are synced to the new Jira issues. So your process stays in Jira; Ragent is the place you shape the backlog before pushing it there.
Create vs update
New backlogs: When you export a conversation’s backlog to Jira, Ragent creates new epics, stories, and tasks. We don’t currently support “add these stories to an existing epic” (e.g. an epic that already lives in Jira and wasn’t created by Ragent). So the main use case is: generate and refine a backlog in Ragent, then one-click export as a new set of issues into your project.
Updates: For work items that were created in Ragent and already exported, we do support updates. Once an item has been pushed to Jira, we store the Jira issue key. If you change that item in Ragent later (e.g. edit title, description, acceptance criteria), we can update that same Jira issue and keep comments/attachments in sync. So: we create new issues for a new export, and we update the issues we created when you edit them in Ragent.
If you’d like to use Ragent to add stories under an existing Jira epic, that’s not in the product today, but we’re happy to hear how you’d want it to work so we can factor it into the roadmap.
Does RAGENT support Jira custom fields and enterprise configurations, and can it automatically detect or generate dependencies between stories and tasks when building the backlog?
@emil_sirbu thank you for your question.
Custom fields & enterprise configuration
Custom fields: We support Jira custom fields. When you connect a project, we load its configuration (including custom fields). On export to Jira, we send any custom fields that are present on the work items (e.g. Epic link, Story Points, and other project-specific fields). When we sync from Jira, we read all custom field values so they’re preserved in Ragent.
Enterprise configuration: We’re project-aware: we use your project’s issue types, custom fields, and users so that we generate and export issues in a way that fits your Jira configuration (e.g. correct Epic link field, issue type mapping). If you have specific fields or workflows that are critical for you, tell us and we can confirm they’re covered.
Dependencies between stories and tasks
We don’t currently support Jira issue links (e.g. “blocks”, “is blocked by”, “relates to”). Dependencies between stories and tasks are expressed through hierarchy at creation time. So the “links” are the parent–child and Epic–Story relationships created when we create the work items in Jira, not separate issue link records. If you rely on explicit issue links for dependency tracking, that isn’t supported today; we can look at adding it in a future release.
If you share your project’s key custom fields or how you want dependencies to behave, we can give a more concrete “yes/no” for your setup.
Hey Product Hunt! 👋
I'm Simeon, creator of RAGENT. I'm excited to share what we've built.
Six months ago, a colleague spent 4 hours in a meeting with stakeholders discussing a 'simple' feature.
She left with many pages of notes, conflicting priorities, and zero clarity. It took her another 6 hours to translate that chaos into Jira tickets and they still missed half the edge cases.
Having being in product for almost two decades, I understand the pressure and pain Product Managers and Business Analysts have to go through; spending hours each week writing Jira tickets instead of focusing on strategy. I have seen PMs spend 4–8+ hours per week on reguirements gathering; time that should go to user research, innovation, building great products and making critical strategic decisions.
What We Built:
RAGENT is your AI requirements analyst. You have a conversation about what you’re building. RAGENT asks the right questions, identifies gaps, understands dependencies, and generates production-ready Jira tickets with acceptance criteria.
Why It’s Different:
It follows Agile best practices for user stories, and acceptance criteria not just generic task creation
Your team can contribute to requirements through natural conversation
Bi-directional sync with Jira, not just one-way export
We built an AI that thinks like a Senior Business Analyst. It doesn't just generate tickets; it reads your documents, asks clarifying questions (if you want) to catch gaps upfront, then creates a complete hierarchical backlog (Epics → Stories → Tasks) with proper acceptance criteria.
Download entire backlog in traditional Excel formats.
What We’re Offering Product Hunt:
14-day trial (vs. 7-day standard). No credit card required! Use: https://ragent.me/signup?ref=HUNTER
1:1 onboarding call with me personally for first 50 signups
Discounts for top 10 commenters who become customers
Start reclaiming 10+ hours per week and see your Sprint Planning events actually start on time. One PM told us: "I finally feel like a Product Manager again, not a ticket typist."
What We Need From You:
Honest feedback. We’re in beta phase, pre-revenue and hungry to learn. What’s missing? What would make this a must-have for your team? What concerns do you have?
Drop your questions below. I’ll be here all day (literally; I cleared my calendar).