Recall
One developer solves it. Every developer knows it.
24 followers
One developer solves it. Every developer knows it.
24 followers
One dev solves it. Every dev's AI already knows it. Your team solves the same bugs twice. The fix lives in one dev's AI session. Everyone else starts from scratch. Recall captures every Claude Code session and shares it across your team automatically. Decisions, fixes, patterns, gotchas. No extra work. Codex and Gemini coming soon. 🔒 End-to-end encrypted. No source code stored. Free for 3 months.
Velona AI
@raydawg88 Thanks for grinding on this with me Ray!
@raydawg88 This solves a very real problem.
AI coding sessions are powerful — but they’re also disposable. Once the chat closes, the reasoning and decisions disappear.
Turning session output into reusable team knowledge is a big missing layer in the current AI dev workflow.
Question: how do you handle conflicting solutions across multiple sessions for the same problem? Is there any merging or ranking logic?
Upvoted — strong concept. Please keep going on this 👏
Velona AI
@emrahg Thanks for the comment!
How Recall handles this today is “evidence-first,” not auto-merge:
recall_get_context keeps sessions separate and shows them chronologically with who/when/status
If two people solved the same problem differently, both approaches are preserved and surfaced; context does not auto-pick a winner.
Ranking logic exists in search/deep-search (relevance + quality boosts), but that is separate from base context
Curious if you like that approach or have something else in mind you'd prefer?