Launching today
Rosentic
Catch when coding agents break each other before merge
58 followers
Catch when coding agents break each other before merge
58 followers
Rosentic checks every PR against every other open PR before merge. When coding agents work in parallel, they break each other in ways no single-PR tool catches. Rosentic catches it. Deterministic analysis. Same scan, same result, every time. Most scans come back clean. That means you're clear to merge. Runs on your infrastructure. One YAML file, no signup, 60-second install.
Rosentic
Hey Product Hunt 👋. I'm Laramie. Nearly 20 years in tech. By day I run technical partnerships. By night I build with Claude Code and Codex on the same repo.
Here's what I kept running into: both agents write good code. Both PRs pass CI. Then they merge and break main. CI checks one branch at a time. Git merges text, not logic. Nobody checks whether the branches are compatible with each other.
With agent orchestration tools shipping weekly and PR volume exploding, this is only getting worse.
So I built Rosentic.
It checks every PR against every other active branch before merge. Deterministic. Same scan, same result, every time.
Most scans come back clean. That means you're clear to merge. When something fires, you catch it before production does.
150+ repos scanned. Real conflicts found and fixed by maintainers. One YAML file, no signup, 60-second install.
What's the messiest merge conflict you or your team has dealt with lately?
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/rosentic-cross-branch-compatibility-check
This is solving a problem that's about to hit every engineering team at scale. When I was CTO running 120 engineers, merge conflicts between humans were already one of our biggest velocity killers - now multiply that by AI agents working in parallel across the same codebase. The hard part isn't detecting the textual conflict - it's catching the semantic breaks where two agents make changes that individually pass tests but together introduce subtle regressions. Curious how you're handling that semantic layer versus pure git-level conflicts?