Shieldome scans your websites for vulnerabilities (DAST) and monitors the dark web for leaked data and breaches β so you find weaknesses before attackers do. What makes it different: pay-as-you-go tokens (1 token = 1 scan, no subscription lock-in), plus a SaaS plan for continuous monitoring. It's white-label ready, so agencies and hosting providers can resell it under their own brand, and everything is accessible via API. Built solo. Enterprise-grade security, minus the enterprise price.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Shieldome
Maker
π
Hey Product Hunt π
I'm a solo founder and developer, and Shieldome is something I've been building on my own for a while now.
It started as a small prototype scanner - I just wanted to check my own sites for common vulnerabilities without paying for enterprise tools. The more I dug in, the more I noticed the same gap everywhere: serious web security is either locked behind expensive enterprise contracts, or it's a pile of scattered open-source tools that most small businesses and agencies never have time to set up.
So I set out to build something in between - powerful enough to actually catch real issues, simple enough that you don't need a security team to use it.
Shieldome does two things:
π DAST-based scanning that finds vulnerabilities on your live websites
π΅οΈ Dark web & breach monitoring that alerts you when your data leaks
A few decisions I made deliberately:
Pay-as-you-go tokens (1 token = 1 scan) so you're not forced into a subscription - plus a SaaS plan if you want continuous monitoring
White-label ready, so agencies and hosting providers can offer it to their own clients under their brand
Full API access for anyone who wants to automate it
The whole thing - development, design, marketing - is a one-person operation, so I'd genuinely love your feedback. What's missing? What would make this a no-brainer for you or your team?
The idea behind it all: find it before they do. πΊ
Report
the pay-as-you-go token setup is honestly refreshing, no more feeling locked into a subscription i barely use. scanned one of my sites and it caught a couple misconfigured headers i had missed for months. solid stuff for a solo build
Report
Maker
@esilatjc6Β Thanks Esila. Headers are the classic blind spot - nothing breaks when they're missing, so there's no moment where you notice. They just quietly stay wrong until someone actually looks.
That's most of why I built the scanning around the boring stuff first rather than chasing exotic vulns. The unglamorous misconfigurations are what most sites are actually running with.
Appreciate you giving it a run.
Report
Really liked the pay-as-you-go token model, feels way more fair than getting stuck in another subscription. The white-label angle is clever too, agencies could actually make something useful out of this.
Report
Maker
@volkanrdqpΒ Thanks Volkan, that's exactly the thinking behind it. One token = one scan, so you only pay for what you actually run - no subscription unless you specifically want continuous monitoring.
The white-label side is where agencies seem most interested: they can put their own branding on the reports and hand them to clients as part of a security or maintenance package, with API access if they want it wired into their own workflow.
Are you agency-side yourself? Curious what would make it genuinely useful in your day-to-day.
the pay-as-you-go token setup is honestly refreshing, no more feeling locked into a subscription i barely use. scanned one of my sites and it caught a couple misconfigured headers i had missed for months. solid stuff for a solo build
@esilatjc6Β Thanks Esila. Headers are the classic blind spot - nothing breaks when they're missing, so there's no moment where you notice. They just quietly stay wrong until someone actually looks.
That's most of why I built the scanning around the boring stuff first rather than chasing exotic vulns. The unglamorous misconfigurations are what most sites are actually running with.
Appreciate you giving it a run.
Really liked the pay-as-you-go token model, feels way more fair than getting stuck in another subscription. The white-label angle is clever too, agencies could actually make something useful out of this.
@volkanrdqpΒ Thanks Volkan, that's exactly the thinking behind it. One token = one scan, so you only pay for what you actually run - no subscription unless you specifically want continuous monitoring.
The white-label side is where agencies seem most interested: they can put their own branding on the reports and hand them to clients as part of a security or maintenance package, with API access if they want it wired into their own workflow.
Are you agency-side yourself? Curious what would make it genuinely useful in your day-to-day.