SUDHI

Personal Board of 10 for decisions that deserve debate

4 followers

Personal Board of 10 for decisions that deserve debate

4 followers

•

•

SUDHI turns one consequential question into a Board of 10 deliberation. Add files or selected Gmail and Calendar evidence, hear ten distinct voices or fast-track a sourced report with visible dissent, assumptions, conditional odds, and next moves. Follow-ups remember prior meetings as observational context, so the Board starts with what changed. The Decision Loop records the choice, outcome, and forecast accuracy. Web app live now; iPhone and iPad coming.

Free Options

Launch tags:Productivity•SaaS•Artificial Intelligence

Launch Team

CloudflareDeploy serverless functions globally in seconds

Promoted

Maker

📌

I built SUDHI because one confident answer is often the wrong shape for a hard decision. Two lessons I took from Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich became its foundation. First, a serious room should not treat easy agreement as proof; it should surface the strongest dissent and work through it. Second, intelligence is not knowing everything yourself. It is knowing where to find dependable knowledge when you need it and turning that knowledge into action. Those are my personal takeaways, not quotations. They led to a Board of 10 with fixed roles across strategy, execution, customer value, risk, economics, contrarian testing, systems, product quality, long-term integrity, and personal capacity. The Board keeps disagreement visible, separates facts from assumptions, researches when current evidence is needed, and states what would change its recommendation. The useful result is concrete: one recommendation, the case against it, conditional odds across likely paths, and a next move. Afterward, the Decision Loop records what you chose, what happened, and whether the Board was well calibrated. The web version is ready to try now at sudhi.app. iPhone and iPad are coming. I would value blunt feedback: what consequential decision would you bring to this room first, and what evidence would make the final report useful enough to act on?

Report

3mo ago

Forum Threads

p/sudhi

•

1mo ago

Could play give founders a safe place to rehearse hard decisions?

Founders often have to validate a customer need, convert interest into revenue, set a price, and protect runway with incomplete evidence. In Slush's 2025 survey of 600+ early-stage European founders, fundraising led as a concern (58.1%); customer acquisition was a hurdle for just over half. That's one regional snapshot, not a universal measure. Source: https://slush.org/newsroom/slush...
The education question that interests me: how can founders practice a decision before the stakes are real? That question led to Founder Arena, a small play-and-learn prototype connected to SUDHI. Choose a move in a startup scenario, see a trade-off, and explain your reasoning. It is an early demo, not a proven training method or a claim of better startup outcomes.
Try the free demo: https://arena.sudhi.app/
If you play it, which choice felt realistic, what was unclear, and which situation should the next scenario cover?

View all