XP One
Replace Waalaxy, Lemlist, LGM, Apollo, Hunter & PB → $29/mo
118 followers
Replace Waalaxy, Lemlist, LGM, Apollo, Hunter & PB → $29/mo
118 followers
You’re probably paying for Waalaxy, Lemlist, LGM, Apollo, Hunter and PhantomBuster. That’s $377+ per month for 6 tools, 6 logins and 6 invoices, and they don’t even work together. XP One replaces all of them. One Chrome extension. One dashboard. Collect leads from LinkedIn in one click. Enrich them with verified emails and phone numbers. Launch campaigns on LinkedIn, Email and WhatsApp. Track everything in a built-in AI CRM. One tool. One flow. $29 per month. More clients.
Hey PH, Walid here.
I’ve spent the last 8 years in lead gen, running hundreds of campaigns.
And honestly, nothing really worked the way it should.
Too many tools.
Too expensive.
Too much time wasted trying to connect 6 or more tools.
-> So we built XP One.
Something simple that actually lets you find and reach clients without stacking 6 or more tools.
We use it ourselves every day.
Last week, I booked 7 meetings in 3 days with a simple WhatsApp flow.
That’s how we got our first users.
Most people spend $300+ per month on different tools.
We made it $29, all in one place.
We’re a team of 4, fully bootstrapped.
We ship fast and we listen to every piece of feedback.
How many tools are you using today to do the same thing? 👇
Happycapy
@walid_builds Love this positioning. The “too many tools” pain is very real.
Congrats!
@victoria_wu Thanks for your support !
DronaHQ
Congrats on the launch!
1 - How are you enriching the leads? Can we expect any difference in successful enrichment in this vs something like Apollo? (since I use Apollo for the Linkedin-to-enrichment-to-email-campaign process, trying to guage how this will create more value).
2 - Since you’re managing multi-channel sequences (LinkedIn, Email, and WhatsApp) in one place, how does the AI CRM handle lead attribution if a prospect replies on WhatsApp after seeing a LinkedIn message, and can we customize the "cooling off" periods between those different channels?
@gayatri_sachdeva Thanks a lot, really appreciate it!
On enrichment → we’re connected to 20+ premium data providers and automatically cross-check the results to maximize match rates (email + phone).
In practice, the goal isn’t just to match Apollo, but to increase reliability by not relying on a single source. You get more consistent data across different types of leads.
On multi-channel + attribution → everything is tracked at the lead level inside the CRM.
So if someone replies on WhatsApp after a LinkedIn touchpoint, the full journey is preserved and you see exactly where the interaction started and how it evolved.
And yes, you can fully customize delays and cooling off periods between each step and each channel, so you stay in control of the sequence logic!
DronaHQ
@walid_builds Right. It’s much better to have one verified lead than five bounces. I also really appreciate the focus on the full journey preservation in the CRM - looking forward to seeing XP One grow!
@gayatri_sachdeva Thanks for your support !
Running lead gen across 6+ tools is painful mostly because context breaks between them. How do you filter out leads who engage just to engage but never actually convert?
@sofiia_havryliuk That’s exactly the issue, it’s not just about tools, it’s about losing context and wasting time on the wrong leads.
We handle this by tracking intent signals across the whole flow (linkedin, email, replies, clicks). You can quickly identify who’s actually engaging with purpose vs. just being reactive, and focus only on the ones showing real buying intent.
Love the idea of combining LinkedIn + email + WhatsApp. Do you have any stats yet on reply rates compared to single-channel campaigns?
@mathieu_kahlaoui It really depends on the industry and the target audience, but on average we’re seeing reply rates at least 2x higher.
The main reason is simple: every lead has a channel where they’re more active, the problem is you never know which one.
This approach increases your chances of reaching them on the right channel, while naturally spreading follow-ups across multiple touchpoints instead of stacking them in one place.
We built XP One because we were tired of paying for 6 different tools that didn't talk to each other. Now everything's in one place. And honestly? Even I'm surprised how fast we find qualified leads.
@fabrice_salah Yes… that was exactly the starting point.
Too many tools, too many logins, no real flow.
We didn’t just want to stack features →
we wanted one clean system that actually works end-to-end.
And the speed of getting qualified leads…
that’s where it really hits.
Zero LinkedIn bans. It's not a marketing slogan — it's a technical obsession. We spent months calibrating delays, randomizing actions, respecting rate limits. Your account security is our #1 priority.
@devopscraftsman Appreciate this.
We’ve seen too many tools chase volume and ignore safety.
For us, it’s simple → no account, no business.
So yeah, everything is built around that.
I've coded dozens of features for SaaS products. XP One is the first time I'm building something I use myself. When a bug bothers me, I fix it within the hour. That's the advantage of being both user AND dev
@rachid_jeffali When you’re both the user and the builder, there’s no delay between pain and solution. That’s how you end up with something that actually works in real conditions, not just on paper.