Dechefini Lahrmann

Curious if people are seeing more issues from API payloads lately or mostly LLM output?

tools like this matter more than people think. most founders don’t skip posting because they don’t have ideas. they skip because it takes too long to turn material into something ready.

I usually decide based on whether the feature removes friction once… or repeatedly. for example with my JSON fixer tool, fixing a broken payload once should be free. everyone hits that problem occasionally. But if someone is fixing malformed API / LLM output constantly, that’s where usage-based or deeper workflow features start making sense. free handles the occasional annoyance. paid supports...

honestly same. one thing I keep running into isn’t even autonomy risk. It’s tiny structural failures in agent output. especially JSON that’s almost valid but breaks pipelines. I ended up building a small fixer for that because I got tired of debugging commas and quotes from API / LLM responses all day. curious if others here are still manually repairing those or just retrying generations?

Hey PH! I'm Dechefini, the architect of JsonFixer. This started when I kept losing 20 minutes per sprint dealing with malformed JSON from ChatGPT, Claude, and API responses. JSON.parse would throw, I'd stare at a 2,000-character blob, and manually hunt for the offending character. After the tenth time I thought: there has to be a better way. JsonFixer runs broken JSON through a four-stage...