Samantha den

Samantha den

Medior HR-applicatiespecialist AFAS

Badges

Tastemaker
Tastemaker
Tastemaker 5
Tastemaker 5
Gone streaking
Gone streaking
Gone streaking 5
Gone streaking 5

Recently Supported

beacon.sh
beacon.shOpen-source self-improving memory for AI coding agents
UnleashX
UnleashXThe AI workforce that turns conversations into outcomes.
Click
ClickManaged agents API that works with any model
Scape
ScapeAn intelligent email inbox that works for you
Orbit
OrbitStop doomscrolling. Earn every app unlock.
TheySaid 4.0
TheySaid 4.0See how users will react, right where you build.
Composio Instant
Composio InstantThe easiest way for AI agents to pay for their own tools
DoOne
DoOneFocus timer with integrations with GitHub, Gitlab & More

Forums

What keeps you using an app you want to replace?

You find an app that looks simpler or costs less. You try it, like it, then go back to the old one because moving your work feels like another project.

The awkward part might be:

What do you still do manually, even though AI could do it?

AI can draft a reply, build a small app, or run a routine task. But being able to automate something does not always mean you want to hand it over.

Sometimes doing it yourself is how you notice a problem or understand what someone actually needs.

•

1mo ago

Should you ship a buggy MVP early, or wait until the product feels completely polished?

hen we built our first app, we followed the classic startup advice to ship fast and fix things later. We launched a very raw version, but initial users were turned off by minor bugs and UI glitches, and most of them never gave us a second chance.

For our second tool, we spent two extra months polishing the core UX and fixing edge cases before letting anyone in. The launch was smaller, but first-time user activation and positive reviews were night and day compared to the first attempt.

Is the ship an embarrassing MVP advice outdated now that users expect high-quality software from day one?

View more