Sparky Solutions

Hey hunters! Today we launched AgentSentinel.

As autonomous AI agents (Claude, Cursor, Devin) gain terminal, DB, and MCP execution access, prompt injection can trigger catastrophic rogue commands (rm -rf, drop table, key leakage).

AgentSentinel sits in-memory as a zero-trust AST circuit breaker:

<0.8ms AST execution delay

A lot of our customers are in India, where WhatsApp often gets a faster reply than email and a phone call still closes more deals than both. With customers in the US and elsewhere, the mix looks different.

We've learned to let each AI employee switch channels: a voice call to qualify, a WhatsApp follow-up with the payment link, an email with the documents.

I'd love real data from other builders. Which channel gets you the best response rate, in which market, and has that changed in the last year?
Support our launch: https://www.producthunt.com/prod...

We hear both extremes. Some teams want AI that only drafts, and a human clicks send on everything. Others want full autonomy.
Where we've landed: let the AI act freely on routine work inside clear rules (book the meeting, update the CRM, send the reminder).
Anything outside the rules, like a non-standard discount or a dispute, waits for a named person. The offer stays unchanged while approval is pending.
It's a middle ground, and we keep adjusting where the line sits for each customer.
Where would you draw it? Which actions would you never let an AI take on its own?
SUPPORT OUR LAUNCH!!!- https://www.producthunt.com/prod...