Jack Andrews

Working on a launch and would love a take on this: Current tagline: "Compare solutions to life's problems by effectiveness and cost" The product ranks 3,400+ solutions across 122 life goals (anxiety, sleep, debt, weight loss, etc.) with effectiveness ratings, cost, time to results, and side effects. Think of it as a comparison tool for life problems instead of consumer electronics. My concern...

I've been using Claude Code for the last few months on a Next.js + Supabase project and switched from Cursor about halfway through. The difference for me came down to how they handle large codebases. Cursor is great when you're working in a single file or a small scope. Claude Code is better when the task touches 10+ files and you need the agent to understand how things connect across the...

Calibrating to a personal baseline is a good design decision. I've used apps that tell me my focus score is "72" with no context for whether that's good or bad for me specifically. Relative improvement from my own starting point is a much more useful signal. How are you using the iPhone sensors for brain measurement? I'm curious whether it's HRV-based (which correlates with cognitive readiness)...

The source traceability is the key differentiator here. I've used tools that summarize documents well but can't point you back to where a specific claim came from, which makes them useless for anything where accuracy matters (legal, compliance, research). What's the latency like on a run of, say, 500 PDFs? And is there a way to set up incremental runs where you add new documents to an existing...

The spend cap and Slack notifications are almost more valuable than the compression itself. Running Claude Code on a large codebase without any spending guardrails is genuinely stressful. You check back after 20 minutes and it's burned through $40 on a rabbit hole. Is the compression lossy in practice? I've seen context window summaries drop important details (like specific variable names or...

Running this on the listener side is a smart design choice. The speaker doesn't have to install anything or feel like they're being "corrected," which would kill adoption immediately. One thing I'm wondering about: does the conversion affect the emotional register of speech? Accents carry a lot of tonal information beyond just phonemes. If someone is frustrated or excited, does that come...

The compare feature is what makes this interesting to me. Individual personality tests are everywhere, but seeing how two profiles interact (and predicting friction points) is a different thing entirely. Curious about the clinical validation behind the "top 5 most likely fights" prediction. Is that based on published attachment research, or is it a proprietary model trained on your own data?...

The "generative UX" framing is interesting. The observation that a travel question should look different from a health question is something most AI interfaces completely ignore. Everything gets the same text-wall treatment regardless of what you're actually trying to do. How do you handle questions where the best answer is "it depends on your situation"? Health questions especially tend to...

Hey PH — I'm Jack from What Worked for Me. If you're trying to manage anxiety, the advice you get depends entirely on who you ask. A doctor says SSRIs. A meditation app says guided breathing. A fitness forum says daily exercise. A supplement subreddit says magnesium and ashwagandha. Every one of those sources is right within its own world. But none of them tells you how these options compare to...