yurukusa

I built cc-safe-setup after 800+ hours of running Claude Code autonomously. The hard lessons: rm -rf disasters, credential leaks, token waste. Every hook in this collection exists because something went wrong in production. 683 hooks, 9,200+ tests, MIT licensed.

@Nika Yes — the biggest one was when we audited our own product and realized the free version had MORE features than the paid version. 10 hooks free vs 6 in the paid tier. Nobody would pay for less. That forced us to rethink: paid isn't "premium features behind a wall." It's "everything free, plus the packaging that saves you time." The install script, the pre-tested config, the 15-minute setup...

This resonates hard. I maintain 440+ open-source developer tools and the docs review bottleneck is real — outdated code samples slip through PRs constantly. The fact that Fowel catches structural gaps (not just typos) is the key differentiator. Most linters stop at formatting. Curious: does it handle multi-language docs, like when a project has both English and Japanese README files?

Real data point from our experience: We built 440 free browser-based developer tools as a portal. Zero revenue for months. Then we packaged the same tools as a Chrome extension with a Pro tier ($4.99/mo for offline access + bookmarks sync). The free version drives trust and traffic, Pro converts the power users who want it always available. The line we drew: if it works in a browser tab, it's...

The slash command approach resonates with how we've been running Claude Code autonomously. We built 100+ SKILL.md files over 108 hours of unattended operation and the key insight was exactly this: specialized roles outperform a single generic agent. The biggest win was separating "plan review" from "code review" — when Claude tries to do both in one pass, it either rubber-stamps or gets lost in...

I use Claude Code daily as a non-engineer. The biggest difference is autonomy. Cursor helps you write code inside an IDE. Claude Code runs as an independent agent that reads your project, makes decisions, and executes multi-file changes without hand-holding. For someone who cant code, Claude Code is the only option that actually works. Built 440+ tools and shipped a game with it. The tradeoff...

The SKILL.md portability angle is the real story here. I maintain a library of 100+ skills for Claude Code and the biggest friction has always been vendor lock-in. Being able to reuse those workflows across tools without rewriting is a genuine time saver. Curious how it handles complex multi-step skills with tool-specific syntax.