... decide which features to sunset without frustrating your existing power users? Comment from Arthur Winston(@arthur_winston3): Power users deserve a conversation before a feature disappears. I'd ask what job it does for them, offer a workablealternative, and give them time to switch. Their answers might also reveal why a seemingly minor feature is worth keeping ...

... being visible. And here's the irony: my LinkedIn account is restricted, while its identity-verification flow keeps sending me in circles. My passport is a valid identity document, but the automated process hasn't given me a workable way to complete verification or reach a meaningful human review. The issue isn't whether I can prove who I am. It's whether the system accepts the document I actually have. When did founders become responsible not only for building ...

... thing I had in my head. Comment from Matthew Abbott(@matthewabbottdev): @moss_ab_mirande_ney  I'm probably in a lucky position whereby I've been running by business for a few years, so have some workable revenue I can repurpose to help launch a product - finite, but manageable. Customers still pay the bills, but who knows what will happen if the product I want to launch does take off? Comment from Matthew Abbott(@matthewabbottdev): @moss_ab_mirande ...

... missing piece. Someone with a foot inside the platform resharing one founder's story does more than any amount of us shouting from behind the wall. Happy to help pressure-test any of this against what's actually workable from here, you clearly care about getting it right, and that's already rare Comment from Askim Stucki (@askim_stucki): @busmark_w_nika  It depends on the person. From my experience, mixed pairs male and female founders together are often ... ... weeks of preparation. Building relationships, identifying the right people, becoming visible in the community, preparing the assets, and creating a real outreach network. It is very difficult to do properly from one day to the next. On the men versus

... Comment from Arnold Oshenye(@oshylabs): Mine is 10 to 12 hours most days, a full time data job and then building products in the evenings, so I will not pretend to have solved it. Two things keep it workable. Training goes in the calendar like a meeting and nothing books over it. And I stopped counting screen time as one number, because the split matters more than the total. Hours spent building leave me tired but fine. The same hours ...

... your hardest question, when two groups want opposite things, I have stopped reading that as a direction to pick. Opposite requests usually mean two different jobs are hiding under one product, and the real decision is not customization versus simplicity, it is which of those two people you are actually building for. Once that is honest, a lot of the contradictory feedback sorts itself, because half of it turns out to come from someone you were never the right tool ... ... landed on the harder half yourself. "Which user are we building for" is the question most roadmaps quietly avoid, because answering it honestly means choosing who you are willing to disappoint. The move that made it workable

... Invented biographical details, made-up methodology names, nothing numeric to check them against. Trust came back, but I now verify the constraint reaches the step that generates rather than the step that plans. Has anyone found a workable way to test for "the model made this up"? Comment from Shivangi Tripathi(@roguetink): I had an agent triage and dedupe a messy backlog for me, a few hundred tickets, and on the surface it did a genuinely good job, with clean ...

... down for you, if anything has? Comment from Omri Ben-Shoham(@omri_ben_shoham1): @Stacy Wycoff @Daniel Boardman both of your points land on the same failure mode from different angles - the doc drifting because nobody updates it, versus the agent having the context but still jumping to assumptions anyway. that second one might actually be the harder problem. even with a perfect write-back loop, you still need the agent to check its memory before acting instead of pattern ... ... making the agent write back to the memory layer, not just read from it, so the context evolves with the work instead of lagging behind it. Comment from Daniel Boardman(@danielboardman): Hate this - as others have said the best workable

... need to reach a break even. - How much revenue you want to get. That could help you shape the target of your commercial services. Comment from M nevver Ertun (@munevver_ertuncc): I like the way you framed it around general vs tailored value, that s a really clean way to think about it. For products, it often feels similar: free should help users understand the value, while paid should unlock outcomes they can t easily get on their own. The tricky ... ... dozens of high-quality one-off videos every year. But if you want a 25-hour course on some deeper subject (how to play piano, speak French, etc) this is a different medium entirely. It is hard to consume vs

... near enough detail about the product and when you click on the top links that you would expect to give more pages with more info, it just redirects you back down to the info you already read. Could be workable if you make the one page long enough; I just haven't seen a really good implementation of a one-page website yet. Of course I understand at this point you probably don't have enough info to fill more ...

... anyone figured this out? The first idea I came up with is: develop code in a jupyter notebook copy/paste code into hex cells This might work well for initial drafting of hex code, but it doesn't feel workable past that phase. (Hypothetically, to iterate on an existing dashboard, I could i) `git export` the current notebook, ii) convert the exported YAML into a notebook, iii) iterate on the notebook, and iv) sync the changes back into the dashboard ... ... would be cool to have plugins or something that enables building features on top of hex. To some extent I imagine a company like hex would probably push toward improving the experience of their platform vs

... what really clicks for me is using it to structure my messy ideas. I ll dump a rough brainstorm whether it s a new product, workshop outline, or code concept and let the AI turn it into a workable draft, then we go back and forth until it makes sense. It s also pushed me into bigger coding projects I wouldn t have tackled alone, since I can lean on AI for boilerplate and quick fixes. The trick ...

... trends over time on category spend, expenses, income, net worth Integrates via Plaid to all banks Doesn't sell my data to credit card companies To pay a monthly fee in exchange for the company to be workable without selling data And then my wishlist is: Let's me invite my spouse Shows brokerage account performance compared to other investing strategies (ex. did I beat the market) Sends me alerts when programmable things happen, ex I want an email ... ... banks (though some banks are still unavailable as it takes time for them to approve you) Doesn't sell my data to credit card companies To pay a monthly fee in exchange for the company to be workable

... than just signing up and disappearing? Would love to hear your insights! Comment from Fabian Maume(@fabian_maume): Outreaching youtube channels work quite well for me: https://blog.apify.com/how-to-bu... Comment from Daniel Zaitzow(@dzaitzow): yea personalized output with a workable product for your target market - Curious what you're using for your affiliate stack / payouts ie? First promoter and simply paying out with Paypal. Something to think about - only paying out affiliates AFTER users/customers are past their refund policy window ...