I tested the images they use as an example and none of them are as they say. See the details of the luminaire in the photo.
https://www.loom.com/share/7cdfd...
Clearly a lie to gain ProductHunter votes. (Test you too)
A shame, as the tool is good, just a little dodgy.
But if it's good, can you lie? No, many people will wonder why they don't achieve the results of advertising, and it's not their fault or the image, it's the lying service!
-
@rrhoover
This service should leave producthunter for promising something it can't do.
@rrhoover@ofmarconi Hi Orlando, thank you for the candid feedback. I just ran the 2 examples again and you're correct that they no longer match the production service (they were run on a dev service that has a different configuration). We're updating them now.
@rrhoover@ofmarconi We've updated the examples (make sure you test in 4x mode, happy to give you a free pro access for your tests :)
Report
@rrhoover@cyrildiagne You'll have to agree with me that this is embarrassing to say the least.
And on the same page there is still the example of the eye that are impossible to achieve even in an AI beta, see this:
It's not a question of 2 or 4 x, is there no information, and in the examples would create the information, like a light bulb? That's a lie, yes.
@rrhoover@ofmarconi I didn't understand that last sentence but you are correct that the eye illustration is not a valid pair. It's used as an illustration here, but we will update to avoid any misconception.
Report
@rrhoover@cyrildiagne He said he is lying when he claims that these images like the one of the Eye were upscaled, when in fact it is an unreal montage.
Replies
ClipDrop
ClipDrop
ClipDrop
ClipDrop