The forum guidelines say "genuine question or insight." I think most people miss the second part.
I've been reading the Product Hunt Forum Guidelines repeatedly, trying to understand why some threads get through and others don't.
The guidelines say: "If it's not a genuine question or a genuine insight, we won't approve the comment—or we'll put it in self-promotion."
I've been thinking about the "insight" part. A genuine insight isn't a lesson. It's not a framework. It's not "10 things I learned." It's an observation that helps someone see something differently.
The difference between "here's what I learned about pricing" and "I raised my prices and lost zero customers—here's what actually happened" is that the second one is an insight. The first is content.
Have you ever posted something you thought was an insight and had it rejected? What was the difference between that and something that got through?
Replies
@hisashispace Good catch separating story from number. Mine stayed in the body both times, never tested whether moving it into the title changes anything on the approval side specifically, only that it helps click through once a thread is already live.
@abdullah_javaid3 From what I've looked into, threads with a title close to an earlier post seem to get rejected too. So I've also been tweaking mine so they don't overlap with anything that's already been posted.
@hisashispace Overlap with my own stuff seems to count too. One of mine got rejected inside a minute, and the closest explanation I found was that I'd made the same point in a comment in that forum about an hour earlier.
Have you had one go through that was close to someone else's thread, or only ones close to your own?
@abdullah_javaid3 Not that I know of. Since then I've been steering clear of anything that overlaps with what's already been posted, mine or anyone else's, so I haven't really tested it.
@hisashispace Fair, that's the safer habit anyway. My verdicts come back in about two minutes either way, approved or rejected. Has one of yours ever sat in review longer than that?
@abdullah_javaid3 Yeah, once. In general mine come back within a few minutes, 20 at most. But one I posted in the Jev forum took about 5 hours to get approved. My guess is product forums get reviewed by the product's own team, but that's just a guess.
Mine was the forum. It was an indexing measurement, 551 Indexing API notifications in 58 days, and I put it in p/vibecoding because I'd posted about indexing in p/general the week before. Rejected in about two minutes. It was also the first thread I'd posted with an image, so I can't say which one did it.
What I can say is that every thread of mine that got approved went in p/general as plain text.
Had one rejected just yesterday. It was a two line question about a tool you dropped, basically no insight in it. The ones that got through all had my own story in them.
@hisashispace Mine were more checkable numbers than story. Both threads that cleared named an exact metric and a date, no narrative at all. The rejected one was a general question with nothing to verify.
@abdullah_javaid3 that fits what happened to me after too. The two I got through since both had a hard number right in the title, 26 days here and 5,000 LinkedIn followers. Story plus a number seems to be the combo.
@hisashispace Five hours is a long time to sit wondering. Your guess makes sense to me, a product forum has a much smaller team behind it than p/general. All of mine went to p/general or p/vibecoding, so I've never seen that side.
Did the Jev one come back with any note, or just the approval?