While I have to agree with you about the benefits of this certain framework, I do not believe it will last as the web itself, and you may be surprised how much you can enable humans by simply accessing native and stupid HTML/CSS. Speaking of the 90s, is it you @garyfung at the crowd there? 👉 youtube.com/watch?v=oeqPrUmVz-o 😀 ❤️
Report
@ishkash_8 the Web's evolution has been with open source, open protocols, higher levels of abstraction. Your argument is like we should write in assembly because that's certainly powerful.
In commercial practice, I and teams do not write straight html and JS (jquery?) anymore. We can drop down to optimize/refine raw html and css of course, but large majority of time we don't. So outputting in straight html/css is about as useful as Figma hifi mockups. Which we definitely do use.
@garyfung I'm not sure how does the web evolution supports your claims? So we should forget about the lower level because there is a higher level? Maybe we should not care about physics because we got biology already?
I am not saying we should or should not use React. I am sure the community romanticizing these solutions too much, and for many use-cases (not yours) plain code is more than enough and more accessible than anything. You may not worry about accessibility as a technical person. I get that.
Report
@ishkash_8 if your audience is non-technical people, then you are competing with nocode builders like Squarespace, Wix, etc.
Vendor lock-in? Not on the high priority list to non technical people who just want to get something accessible working.
My 2c anyway. Good luck
Replies
rnbw
rnbw
News Sentinel by Blockbrain