Generate perfect replies on X (Twitter) in one click. AI-powered Chrome extension with personalized voice profiles, smart web search, and image analysis.
Hey Product Hunt! π
I built Warbl out of pure frustration.
You know that feeling when you see a great tweet, want to engage, and then... you just stare at the reply box? That was me, every single day.
I knew engaging on X was the #1 way to grow. Every creator says it. But here's what nobody talks about: the mental effort is exhausting.
I'd spend 5 minutes crafting a single reply. Rewriting it 3 times. Wondering if it sounds stupid. Then often just... closing the tab.
So I built Warbl for myself.
Not to let AI speak for me, but to remove that blank page anxiety. Now when I see a tweet I want to engage with, I click one button and get a starting point that actually sounds like me.
The result? I went from 5-10 replies a day to 50+. My impressions exploded. But honestly, the best part is that I actually enjoy engaging on X again.
Warbl learns your voice, your profession, your tone, your topics. It's like having a writing buddy who knows exactly how you talk.
A few things I'm proud of:
- π― One-click replies directly in X's interface
- πΌοΈ Image analysis (it sees what's in the tweet)
- β¨ Refine & translate your drafts
Free tier available (5 replies/day) so you can try it without commitment.
Would love your feedback, this is just v1 and I'm building in public.
Let's chat! π¬
@0x_alxΒ Does it analyze our past tweets to learn the syntax or we are just selecting a generic "witty" or "professional" preset? what about those who have not written much on X?
@mohsinproductΒ Unfortunately, I don't use the X API directly, which makes scraping your reply history impossible for now.
That said, there's an alternative I've been thinking about: during onboarding, we could present you with different tweet scenarios and ask you to reply in your own words. That way, the tool could analyze your real tone of voice and syntax from scratch.
Definitely something worth exploring. Thanks for the feedback, this is gold! π
Report
As an X user for marketing purposes, l can tell this tool solves a real issue but l do not get your business model in terms of monetization: you offer unlimited ai replies to premium users, so l can use this tool either 3-5 times a day or even 100+ times a day. The price l pay does not change. If a great number of your users use the tool for numerous times consistently each day, Then it will not be a profitable business. Additionally, there might be bot attacks increasing ai costs dramatically. Why did you choose to offer umlimited with fixed price
@eren_kiratliΒ Really appreciate the thoughtful question, you're raising a valid concern and it shows you've got a sharp business eye π
Honestly, the unlimited model is a bet on simplicity and user experience. Most users won't hit 200+ replies a day, so the pricing is based on average usage patterns. And for those power users who do engage heavily? They're likely getting real value and results from the tool, which means they'll stick around longer, that's a trade-off I'm willing to make.
As for bot attacks, there are rate limits and safeguards in place to prevent abuse.
That said, you're right that this model might evolve as usage data comes in. For now, I'd rather keep it simple and attractive for early adopters, then adjust if needed.
Thanks for the feedback, this is exactly the kind of thinking that helps refine the approach!
Report
It is a great product as it is, but I would actually feel a lot comfortable using the tool if I knew the tool has scrapped all my replies in the past, and is using them as a reference to generate replies in my style and syntax!
@nabeeltakΒ Love this idea and totally get where you're coming from! Having the tool learn from your actual past replies would be the dream.
Unfortunately, I don't use the X API directly, which makes scraping your reply history impossible for now.
That said, there's an alternative I've been thinking about: during onboarding, we could present you with different tweet scenarios and ask you to reply in your own words. That way, the tool could analyze your real tone of voice and syntax from scratch.
Definitely something worth exploring. Thanks for the feedback, this is gold! π
Report
That's actually really interesting. Aren't we limited to the topic shown in the image? Let's say, if I mostly engage with music-related threads, would that be possible? Either way, it's really great work, well done!
@xencueΒ Right now, yes, there are some limitations, but feedback like yours is super valuable to help shape and improve the product, so really appreciate you sharing this!
That said, the topic you select only influences the tone of voice, not the actual content. The extension understands the context of each tweet and generates replies based on that. So if you're engaging with music-related threads, it'll pick up on that and craft responses accordingly.
Give it a try and let me know how it goes!
Report
@0x_alxΒ Oh I see, that sounds nice, I'll definitely try it out! Thanks Alex!
Wow, Warbl looks awesome! Love the personalized voice profiles β thats such a clever idea. Curious how the AI handles responding to threads with lots of nested replies?
@jaydev13Β Thanks a lot! Glad you like the voice profiles idea π
To be honest, right now Warbl only handles single tweets, threads with nested replies aren't supported yet. Since I don't use the X API directly, fetching the full thread context isn't possible at the moment.
It's definitely a limitation I'm aware of, and something I'd love to improve down the road. For now, it works best for jumping into individual posts and engaging quickly!
I appreciate that Warbl positions itself as a writing buddy. We have too many "copilots" that does similar things ... Like it helping people stay consistent on X without losing their own voice. Congrats on the launch.
@frank_li13Β That's exactly the vision! Not another "AI that tweets for you" but something that helps you stay active and consistent while keeping your own voice. The goal is to remove the friction, not the personality.
Thanks for the support!
Report
Congrats on the launch, Alex.
I can totally relate to this.
It's not that easy to be crafting replies to tweets.
I really like how youβre solving that blank page frustration.
But it seems your page isn't communicating the real value. f you want, Iβd be happy to share a quick rewrite or a few landing page suggestions that might help boost sign-ups.
@victoria_111Β Thanks so much! Really glad the concept resonates π
And yeah, you're right, I put the landing page together pretty quickly just to get something out there. It's definitely on my list to revisit and improve.
Report
@0x_alxΒ Aiit. Do let me know when you're ready to do that.
I'd be glad to help.
Report
Hello,
I like it, but you have an issue with your pro upgrade URL; it gives me a 500 error.
Is it still not working ? Can you DM me on X @indie_alx ?
Report
50x impressions on X is impressive! The personalized voice profiles and image analysis features sound powerful. I'm curious about the AI behind this - which LLM powers the reply generation? Is it using Claude, GPT-4, or a custom fine-tuned model? How do you ensure the AI captures the user's authentic voice while maintaining engagement quality? π¦
To answer your question, Warbl is powered by Gemini with heavily optimized prompting. No fine-tuning, just a lot of iteration on the prompts to get the tone and context right.
For capturing the user's authentic voice, it's all about layering: the voice profile settings define how you sound, while the AI analyzes the tweet content to understand what you're responding to. Keeping those two separate is key to avoiding generic-sounding replies.
Still refining it, but the results have been pretty solid so far!
Report
aha, sign in google failed. Are you sure the product ready?
Replies
Warbl
PicWish
@0x_alxΒ Does it analyze our past tweets to learn the syntax or we are just selecting a generic "witty" or "professional" preset? what about those who have not written much on X?
Warbl
@mohsinproductΒ Unfortunately, I don't use the X API directly, which makes scraping your reply history impossible for now.
That said, there's an alternative I've been thinking about: during onboarding, we could present you with different tweet scenarios and ask you to reply in your own words. That way, the tool could analyze your real tone of voice and syntax from scratch.
Definitely something worth exploring. Thanks for the feedback, this is gold! π
As an X user for marketing purposes, l can tell this tool solves a real issue but l do not get your business model in terms of monetization: you offer unlimited ai replies to premium users, so l can use this tool either 3-5 times a day or even 100+ times a day. The price l pay does not change. If a great number of your users use the tool for numerous times consistently each day, Then it will not be a profitable business. Additionally, there might be bot attacks increasing ai costs dramatically. Why did you choose to offer umlimited with fixed price
Warbl
@eren_kiratliΒ Really appreciate the thoughtful question, you're raising a valid concern and it shows you've got a sharp business eye π
Honestly, the unlimited model is a bet on simplicity and user experience. Most users won't hit 200+ replies a day, so the pricing is based on average usage patterns.
And for those power users who do engage heavily? They're likely getting real value and results from the tool, which means they'll stick around longer, that's a trade-off I'm willing to make.
As for bot attacks, there are rate limits and safeguards in place to prevent abuse.
That said, you're right that this model might evolve as usage data comes in. For now, I'd rather keep it simple and attractive for early adopters, then adjust if needed.
Thanks for the feedback, this is exactly the kind of thinking that helps refine the approach!
It is a great product as it is, but I would actually feel a lot comfortable using the tool if I knew the tool has scrapped all my replies in the past, and is using them as a reference to generate replies in my style and syntax!
Warbl
@nabeeltakΒ Love this idea and totally get where you're coming from! Having the tool learn from your actual past replies would be the dream.
Unfortunately, I don't use the X API directly, which makes scraping your reply history impossible for now.
That said, there's an alternative I've been thinking about: during onboarding, we could present you with different tweet scenarios and ask you to reply in your own words. That way, the tool could analyze your real tone of voice and syntax from scratch.
Definitely something worth exploring. Thanks for the feedback, this is gold! π
That's actually really interesting. Aren't we limited to the topic shown in the image? Let's say, if I mostly engage with music-related threads, would that be possible?
Either way, it's really great work, well done!
Warbl
@xencueΒ Right now, yes, there are some limitations, but feedback like yours is super valuable to help shape and improve the product, so really appreciate you sharing this!
That said, the topic you select only influences the tone of voice, not the actual content. The extension understands the context of each tweet and generates replies based on that. So if you're engaging with music-related threads, it'll pick up on that and craft responses accordingly.
Give it a try and let me know how it goes!
@0x_alxΒ Oh I see, that sounds nice, I'll definitely try it out! Thanks Alex!
Warbl
@xencueΒ π«ΆπΌ
Wow, Warbl looks awesome! Love the personalized voice profiles β thats such a clever idea. Curious how the AI handles responding to threads with lots of nested replies?
Warbl
@jaydev13Β
Thanks a lot! Glad you like the voice profiles idea π
To be honest, right now Warbl only handles single tweets, threads with nested replies aren't supported yet. Since I don't use the X API directly, fetching the full thread context isn't possible at the moment.
It's definitely a limitation I'm aware of, and something I'd love to improve down the road. For now, it works best for jumping into individual posts and engaging quickly!
Minara
I appreciate that Warbl positions itself as a writing buddy. We have too many "copilots" that does similar things ...
Like it helping people stay consistent on X without losing their own voice.
Congrats on the launch.
Warbl
@frank_li13Β That's exactly the vision! Not another "AI that tweets for you" but something that helps you stay active and consistent while keeping your own voice. The goal is to remove the friction, not the personality.
Thanks for the support!
Congrats on the launch, Alex.
I can totally relate to this.
It's not that easy to be crafting replies to tweets.
I really like how youβre solving that blank page frustration.
But it seems your page isn't communicating the real value. f you want, Iβd be happy to share a quick rewrite or a few landing page suggestions that might help boost sign-ups.
Warbl
@victoria_111Β Thanks so much! Really glad the concept resonates π
And yeah, you're right, I put the landing page together pretty quickly just to get something out there. It's definitely on my list to revisit and improve.
@0x_alxΒ Aiit. Do let me know when you're ready to do that.
I'd be glad to help.
Hello,
I like it, but you have an issue with your pro upgrade URL; it gives me a 500 error.
Warbl
@viktorvillalobosΒ Hey Victor ! Thank's for the feedback.
Is it still not working ? Can you DM me on X @indie_alx ?
50x impressions on X is impressive! The personalized voice profiles and image analysis features sound powerful. I'm curious about the AI behind this - which LLM powers the reply generation? Is it using Claude, GPT-4, or a custom fine-tuned model? How do you ensure the AI captures the user's authentic voice while maintaining engagement quality? π¦
Warbl
@new_user___01920256530b9f092c9e057Β
Thanks! Glad those features caught your eye π
To answer your question, Warbl is powered by Gemini with heavily optimized prompting. No fine-tuning, just a lot of iteration on the prompts to get the tone and context right.
For capturing the user's authentic voice, it's all about layering: the voice profile settings define how you sound, while the AI analyzes the tweet content to understand what you're responding to. Keeping those two separate is key to avoiding generic-sounding replies.
Still refining it, but the results have been pretty solid so far!
aha, sign in google failed. Are you sure the product ready?
Warbl
@tibelfΒ fixing some last minute bugs ! almost 1000 replies generated and 4 paid users. th product works, need just some fix π