Launching today
Dedica
Check if AI agents can use your website
175 followers
Check if AI agents can use your website
175 followers
Dedica tests your website the way AI agents use it, then gives your team a fix for every place they fail. Muse, Instinct, GrokBot and other agents now browse, compare and sign up on people's behalf. Dedica runs 125 checks (for free) to see if they can use your site, and gives you a fix for every issue to hand to your coding agent.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I built Dedica after watching an agent try to sign a team up for a SaaS tool. It found the pricing page, got an empty page because the plans only loaded with JavaScript, then hit a bot check on sign-up and gave up. The agent didn't report an error to anyone. It just told the user "I couldn't do that".
What Dedica does
Runs 125 checks across Discovery, Access, Usability and Payments, the way agents like Muse, Instinct or GrokBot use a site
Gives you a score out of 100 and the fixes that move it most, free, in under a minute, no signup
For $30 (launch price, normally $50, one-time per site), the fix kit gives you one instruction file per issue. Each says what to change and how to check it worked, ready to drop into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or Copilot.
There's also a public API and an MCP server, so your agent can check sites itself.
For today: post your domain in the comments and I'll reply with your score and the single biggest thing holding it back.
Would love your feedback!
That agent story is the reason we built this. Most sites were never designed for software that reads them, so the failure is often silent: an agent hits a JavaScript-only pricing page or a bot check and just gives up, and the owner never finds out.
@prajwal_paloju1 The idea of getting actionable fixes instead of just a score makes dedica much more useful for developers and site owners
@shivam_kushwaha16 thanks shivam!
@prajwal_paloju1 np man
Thanks @shivam_kushwaha16 !
Congrats on the launch! What happens when a site uses Cloudflare or CAPTCHA, does Dedica flag those as agent blockers?
Yes Ayberk! In fact, that's one of the most common reasons agent can't reach a website.
yes @ayberkbozkus, agent accessibility is one key metric in our scoring
Great one guys! This is interesting, especially now. Curious to know what’s been the biggest challenge you found when testing sites for agent compatibility?
@dheeraj20 thanks! most agents are blocked because of firewall rules or some sort of captchas
@dheeraj20 the biggest challenge was also around figuring what metrics matter vs not
Really want to use this , but the price is too high, Also not sure how different it is from a regular site audit though.
Do you offer any discounts/coupon codes for early users to try out first.
Thanks@mohammedi for checking dedica out
Unlike regular site audit which does seo/geo which helps agents discover your website. We also make sure if agents can see, use and pay on your website when they land there.
will keep you posted on any discounts
Do you have integration with Webflow to run the audit before publishing the changes?
hey @vijayanandkailash, unfortunately not, but this is in the pipeline. we'll keep you posted!
Hey Vijayanand, not yet! Right now you run the audit on the live url. Thank for suggestion thought, we will keep you posted if anything changes.
@prathmesh_bhalekar The reason I am asking that we need the audit at the code level. Web scrapping is not reliable, mainly for AEO.
@vijayanandkailash yes, we've been hearing this problem quite a lot - we're building a fix for this! thanks for the feedback
pulling for you today, a fix file per issue for Claude Code is a nice touch. what does the Payments part check, can an agent actually get through checkout?
@olia_nemirovski yes we check if your website supports agentic payment protocols like x402, mpp, etc
@olia_nemirovski yes, given the rise of agentic payments and micro-transactions, payments become super important for agent usability
hey @prajwal_paloju1 @prathmesh_bhalekar , this looks super cool! how did you guys come up with the scoring and the logic behind the relevant checks?
amazing product!
@prathmesh_bhalekar @ananya_saxena2 hey ananya, thanks for the message. we run a bunch of static and agent driven checks to see how good the website it. we keep a track of all the emerging protocols (eg. WebMCP) and score based on that
@prathmesh_bhalekar @prajwal_paloju1 oh got it, so do check whether agent is able to signup or check if it read the site
hi, @ananya_saxena2 we can do both
@ananya_saxena2 we share the results in the order of priority so you can fix it accordingly
Thanks for trying out Ananya!