Rankfender is the platform to control your visibility. It tracks how your brand, products, and content appear across search, AI systems, and the web. It connects your data, detects gaps, and turns insights into clear actions. From content generation to publishing and optimization, Rankfender executes your visibility strategy end to end. It continuously monitors performance, prioritizes what matters, and helps you stay ahead of competitors. One system. No guesswork. Full control.
This is the 2nd launch from Rankfender. View more
Rankfender v3.0
Launching today
Built for marketers, founders and agencies tired of switching between SEO tools. Rankfender 3.0 brings keyword research, rank tracking incl. AI Overviews, competitor and backlink analysis, site audits, traffic, content and Social, and strategy into one place, and adds what the old tools miss: how ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and 4 more AI assistants talk about your brand. Work in the app, or connect Claude or ChatGPT and let your AI agent run it.
Payment Required
Launch Team
Render Sandboxes: a computer for every agentRun untrusted code safely. Idle sandboxes cost nothing
Promoted
Otterly.AI
Hey Product Hunt 👋 Imed here, founder of Rankfender.
When we first launched here in March, Rankfender did one thing: it showed whether your brand appeared in AI answers. Since then we've been listening closely to our users, customers and this community: every support message, every feature request, every "can it also do…?".
The message was consistent. Teams didn't want one more SEO tool. They wanted one place that does the whole job.
So we spent the last months rebuilding Rankfender around that feedback.
Rankfender 3.0 is the SEO/GEO operating system, built for people and AI agents:
• Research: keywords, competitor gaps, backlinks
• Measure: Google rankings incl. AI Overviews, Google + Bing traffic, and how ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and 4 more AI assistants talk about you
• Act: site audits and a 90-day strategy with every fix written out
• Publish: research-backed articles, sent straight to WordPress
• Delegate: connect Claude or ChatGPT and let your AI agent run it
A sincere thank-you to everyone who used Rankfender, reported bugs and asked for more. Most of 3.0 exists because you asked for it.
🎁 For the Product Hunt community: a free SEO + AI visibility audit of your site, worth $600. You get your technical health, your Google rankings, where competitors beat you, how AI assistants describe your brand, and a prioritized fix list. Leave your URL in the comments to get it.
👉 Want to see Rankfender on your own project? Book your demo with the founder.
Leave your URL below and our team will send it within 48 hours.
We're shipping requests live all day. What should we build next? 👇
@busmark_w_nika Thank you for your everlasting support Nika !!
We always had your comments as something we appreciate in our team !!
We would love you to suggest what we need to ship next, something that a SEO/GEO platform must have or that you wish it could there !! What would you suggest next ?
If I publish a fix and the next recheck cites me, do you count that as the fix working or just normal AI answer noise?
@igorblink Honest answer: today, no. One re-check is one sample, and AI answers move around between runs even when nothing changed. We store every answer and show the trend per question and per assistant, but we don't yet tell you "this is your fix working" vs "this is noise". You have to read the trend yourself.
What we'd want it to do:
• mark the day you published the fix on the question's chart
• compare how often you were cited before vs after, per assistant
• only call it "working" when the citation holds across more than one assistant or more than one re-check, and say "too early to tell" otherwise
That's a great Hypership request. Could you post it as a request ("Tell me if my fix worked or if it's noise")? It builds directly on this morning's Re-check now, so it's a good candidate to ship today. 🙌
The prioritized fix list is the part I'd look at first. Keeping the search result or AI answer that prompted each fix beside it would help explain why that work matters.
@oleksii_sekundant Thanks, that's exactly how we think about it too. Today each move in Strategy shows why it's there: the numbers behind it (position, search volume, how often the AI assistants name you vs a competitor). It doesn't yet show the actual Google result or AI answer that triggered it. Putting that next to the fix ("here's what ChatGPT said, here's why this page should change it") is a great idea. It's going on the roadmap and I'll reply here when it ships.
Congrats on v3.0! "Re-check now" after publishing a fix looks like a small thing, but it saves a lot of waiting. Good luck with the launch today 🙌
@gevorgarakelyann Thank you! 🙌 It came straight from a request this morning: Juan asked for it, and it shipped a few hours later in 3.0.1. You're right, it's a small button, but it removes a week of waiting right when you most want to know whether a fix worked.
We're shipping requests all day for Hypership, so if there's anything you'd want Rankfender to do next, drop it here and we'll try to ship it today.
Can you see which sources an AI assistant cited when it mentioned a competitor? That would help explain where the gap comes from
@marianna_tymchuk Yes, partly today. Every AI answer we store keeps the brands it named and the sources it cited, so you can open any answer where a competitor shows up and see exactly which pages the assistant leaned on. Each question also has Source URLs / Source Domains tabs, and the Answers tab groups every cited URL by domain (yours vs external).
Note that sources only exist when the assistant actually searched the web (ChatGPT with search, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews). Answers from memory alone don't cite anything.
What's missing is the one-click view you're describing: "show me only the sources behind answers that name Competitor X". Great request, we're building it today for Hypership and I'll reply here when it's live.
(or, if not today:) Great request, it's on the roadmap and I'll reply here when it ships.
Please add it as suggestion to be shipped today !
seeing what Claude and Perplexity say about a brand right next to the Google rankings is the combo most teams still do by hand, two tools and a spredsheet
for the AI side, do you run the same prompt set every day so you can see how the answers drift over time??? and roughly how many prompts per project before it gets pricey???
@thamibenjelloun Exactly the spreadsheet we wanted to kill 🙂
Yes, it's the same question set every run, so you see each question's answers drift over time, per assistant. Weekly on every plan, every 2 days on Professional, daily on Business. As of today (3.0.1) you can also re-check any single question on demand, e.g. right after publishing a fix.
Plans include 15 tracked questions on Essential, 30 on Professional and 80 on Business, across 5, 7 or 8 assistants. Each answer runs on the cheapest current model per assistant, so the real cost is the number of questions × assistants × how often you run them. Most teams are fine weekly with 15–30 well-chosen questions; daily runs make sense for a handful of money questions.