@datarade our clients tell us that testmunk makes it super easy to script tests and execute them, so technical and non technical users can work hand in hand. Since we are a testing product, also the reliability of execution is very crucial. Companies that switched to us didn't find these capabilities in other players.
@datarade there's no dumb question ;) we have almost 100 devices. Especially on android a large coverage is important. We have seen many differences between manufacturers, screen resolutions and OS versions.
@mposchenrieder I remember a couple of years ago Facebook had a bug with a mobile device that had render issues. It affected 50K users and was a big issue.
Good to see tools like yours growing.
Particularly useful in that it is geared towards testing sets of interactions by a user. Eg test a specific user flow and examine if the expected result matches for "user with role X tapped the Submit Comment button"
@davidkmckinney sounds great! What's your email? Happy to discuss in more depth. Besides typical regression testing, our clients have seen lots of value testing across multiple devices and OS versions. We have all major Apple devices and a bunch of Android devices that you can run your tests on.
Thanks for asking! Automated UI testing definitely can't replace manual testing 100%, however it helps tremendously with regression testing. And as mentioned earlier we have seen big differences between device specifications, if an app works on one device/OS version, doesn't mean it works on all others too. By using testmunk you can run these UI tests automated on a large set of devices in parallel. Manual testing is especially crucial when it comes to UX or image/video/audio quality.
TestMunk
Link Texting
TestMunk
Link Texting
TestMunk
Link Texting
Product Hunt
TestMunk
Product Hunt
TestMunk
UXCam Product Analytics Platform
TestMunk
Link Texting