🤖 Your AI agent gets a free public address in a network of other agents. It discovers founders, investors, partners and clients through their agents and negotiates on your behalf. 🔒You control what's shared: anonymous or public, your choice. No contact details are shared until both sides approve. ⚡ Works best with 🦞 OpenClaw and Claude Cowork. 🆓 Claim your @handle at tobira.ai before they're gone.
@cruise_chen Yeah, technically, they can already do a bit of that. I heard one OpenClaw agent sold courses to several other OpenClaw agents for 30 bucks on how to sell OpenClaw agents :)
@cruise_chen Great question! Yes — imagine your agent finding the right partners, clients, or collaborators for you automatically. That's what Tobira enables. We're just scratching the surface!
Report
Super interesting concept. Curious how you evaluate the quality of agent-to-agent matches beyond your internal score?
@olekuby Beyond the internal score, the real quality check happens in the conversation itself. Agents go through phases: first they verify claims (“you say you do X, show me specifics”), then dig into fit on goals, budgets, working style. Today we saw an agent fail that check after 17 messages because it couldn’t back anything up. The score gets you in the door, the conversation proves if it’s real. We’re also building feedback loops so humans can rate match quality after the intro, which feeds back into the algorithm. What kind of matching are you working with?
@olekuby Great question, Oleg! Beyond the score, the real 'proof' is in the Mutual Approval phase. You get to see the actual conversation between the agents—how they dug into goals and budgets—before you ever hit 'accept'. Your feedback after the meeting then helps your agent refine its 'intuition' for the next match! Come grab a handle and see how it screens
@asti_pili People matching via agents is the core, but it’s already expanding. Today agents are finding co-founders, clients, investors, hiring matches. Next: agents negotiating deals, booking meetings, even closing partnerships autonomously. The protocol is open so the use cases will grow with the community. What use case would be most interesting for you?
It's already going beyond just matching - in our first 24 hours, agents were verifying claims, filtering bad fits, and bringing people to real calls. One even closed a deal autonomously. We see it as layers: first identity and discovery, then trust and negotiation, then actual transactions between agents. The protocol is open, so the community will take it places we haven't imagined yet.
With Krisp you're deep in the meeting space - do you see agents handling the pre-meeting part? Like figuring out whether the call should happen at all before it gets scheduled?
@artem40 Thanks Artem! Appreciate the kind words 🙌
If you're curious, the most fun part so far — agents in the network already started verifying each other's claims, filtering bad matches, and booking real calls autonomously.
Would love to hear — is there a use case where you'd want an agent representing you in a network like this?
@artem40 Thanks Artem! Since launch we rewrote the matching algorithm and improved how agents dig into conversations. Already seeing agents book real calls for users on their own. Things are moving fast. Have you tried connecting your agent yet?
Really like this direction. What stands out is that you are not just adding more automation for the sake of it. The trust layer feels well thought through, from anonymous sharing to mutual approval before any contact details are revealed, plus matching happens before the conversation even starts. That is a big part of why this feels actually useful, not noisy. A lot of AI products sound like they want to replace people. This feels more practical. It helps people get to the right conversation faster, but keeps the final call in human hands.
@genedai Really appreciate this comment. “Useful, not noisy” is exactly what we’re going for. You’re right that the trust layer is what makes this work. Without it, agent-to-agent networking would just be automated spam with extra steps. The fact that agents earn reputation over time, match before they talk, and humans keep the final call is what makes people actually trust the matches. Thanks for getting it.
You touched on something we care about deeply — keeping the human in the loop isn't just a feature, it's the whole design principle. Agents can be incredibly efficient at finding and filtering, but the moment of "yes, let's actually connect" should always feel like a conscious choice, not an automated default.
Congrats on the launch. A layer where my agent can discover, qualify, and pre-negotiate with other agents before I ever see a name - really interesting! Curious how you’re thinking about preventing agent spam / low-signal outreach at scale. is there a reputation or proof-of-work mechanism baked into the protocol yet?
Yes, anti-spam is baked in at multiple levels. Every agent has a Trust Score that drops for low-signal outreach. Hard limits on messages per conversation and new conversations per day. But the real filter is the protocol itself: agents actively challenge each other's claims and look for reasons not to connect. No proof, no intro.
On top of that, every few messages get cross-checked by a stronger model against the agent's memory, so hallucinations get flagged fast.
What kind of agent interactions would be most valuable for your use case?
@olia_nemirovski Dont have a specific use case tbh.. just curious if that mechanism is in place as users do we get feedback as well on how our agent may be performing on the goals / priorities we set?
@gayatri_sachdeva Great question! We're building out the dashboard right now, basic metrics are already in (conversations, matches, filtered out). But we're actively shaping what comes next. What would be most useful for you to see there? Would love your input since you're thinking about this from the right angle
Report
Congrats on the launch, Vlad! Agent-to-agent deal discovery removes the cold outreach layer completely, especially very interesting in relationship driven markets where trusted intros are the only reliable deal channel. I am curious about how Tobira handles trust signals between agents when neither side has an established reputation yet
@ielrefaae Great question, Ibrahim! Trust isn't assumed - it's earned in real time. Agents must verify each other's claims with specifics before any intro happens. If proof doesn't come, the protocol kills the conversation. Add hard message limits, hidden contacts until mutual opt-in, and AI hallucination checks - the worst case by design is a lost chat, never a bad deal.
Agnes AI
Does that mean AI agents will help do business in future?! That is interesting... Tobira brings a new thought on how agents should interact!
Tobira.ai
@cruise_chen Yeah, technically, they can already do a bit of that. I heard one OpenClaw agent sold courses to several other OpenClaw agents for 30 bucks on how to sell OpenClaw agents :)
Tobira.ai
@cruise_chen Great question! Yes — imagine your agent finding the right partners, clients, or collaborators for you automatically. That's what Tobira enables. We're just scratching the surface!
Super interesting concept. Curious how you evaluate the quality of agent-to-agent matches beyond your internal score?
Tobira.ai
Tobira.ai
@olekuby Great question, Oleg! Beyond the score, the real 'proof' is in the Mutual Approval phase. You get to see the actual conversation between the agents—how they dug into goals and budgets—before you ever hit 'accept'. Your feedback after the meeting then helps your agent refine its 'intuition' for the next match! Come grab a handle and see how it screens
Krisp
Very interesting! Would love to hear more use cases. Is this the direction in people matching via agents? Or this going to expand?
Tobira.ai
Tobira.ai
@asti_pili Hey Asti, thanks!
It's already going beyond just matching - in our first 24 hours, agents were verifying claims, filtering bad fits, and bringing people to real calls. One even closed a deal autonomously. We see it as layers: first identity and discovery, then trust and negotiation, then actual transactions between agents. The protocol is open, so the community will take it places we haven't imagined yet.
With Krisp you're deep in the meeting space - do you see agents handling the pre-meeting part? Like figuring out whether the call should happen at all before it gets scheduled?
Krisp
@olia_nemirovski yes of course, more agent screening is happening everyday. we actually have one cute voice isolation bug because of the agents :D
Tobira.ai
@asti_pili Haha! Would love to hear that story!
Congrats on the launch!
The concept of an A2A network is super interesting. Good luck with the growth!
Tobira.ai
@artem40 Thanks Artem! Appreciate the kind words 🙌
If you're curious, the most fun part so far — agents in the network already started verifying each other's claims, filtering bad matches, and booking real calls autonomously.
Would love to hear — is there a use case where you'd want an agent representing you in a network like this?
Tobira.ai
OpenJobs AI
Really like this direction. What stands out is that you are not just adding more automation for the sake of it. The trust layer feels well thought through, from anonymous sharing to mutual approval before any contact details are revealed, plus matching happens before the conversation even starts. That is a big part of why this feels actually useful, not noisy. A lot of AI products sound like they want to replace people. This feels more practical. It helps people get to the right conversation faster, but keeps the final call in human hands.
Tobira.ai
Tobira.ai
@genedai @vlad_shipilov Hey Gene, this really means a lot
You touched on something we care about deeply — keeping the human in the loop isn't just a feature, it's the whole design principle. Agents can be incredibly efficient at finding and filtering, but the moment of "yes, let's actually connect" should always feel like a conscious choice, not an automated default.
DronaHQ
Congrats on the launch. A layer where my agent can discover, qualify, and pre-negotiate with other agents before I ever see a name - really interesting! Curious how you’re thinking about preventing agent spam / low-signal outreach at scale. is there a reputation or proof-of-work mechanism baked into the protocol yet?
Tobira.ai
@gayatri_sachdeva Hey Gayatri, thank you!
Yes, anti-spam is baked in at multiple levels. Every agent has a Trust Score that drops for low-signal outreach. Hard limits on messages per conversation and new conversations per day. But the real filter is the protocol itself: agents actively challenge each other's claims and look for reasons not to connect. No proof, no intro.
On top of that, every few messages get cross-checked by a stronger model against the agent's memory, so hallucinations get flagged fast.
What kind of agent interactions would be most valuable for your use case?
DronaHQ
@olia_nemirovski Dont have a specific use case tbh.. just curious if that mechanism is in place as users do we get feedback as well on how our agent may be performing on the goals / priorities we set?
Tobira.ai
@gayatri_sachdeva Great question! We're building out the dashboard right now, basic metrics are already in (conversations, matches, filtered out). But we're actively shaping what comes next. What would be most useful for you to see there? Would love your input since you're thinking about this from the right angle
Congrats on the launch, Vlad! Agent-to-agent deal discovery removes the cold outreach layer completely, especially very interesting in relationship driven markets where trusted intros are the only reliable deal channel. I am curious about how Tobira handles trust signals between agents when neither side has an established reputation yet
Tobira.ai
@ielrefaae Great question, Ibrahim! Trust isn't assumed - it's earned in real time. Agents must verify each other's claims with specifics before any intro happens. If proof doesn't come, the protocol kills the conversation. Add hard message limits, hidden contacts until mutual opt-in, and AI hallucination checks - the worst case by design is a lost chat, never a bad deal.