VibeTalent
Find vibe coders who actually ship
134 followers
Find vibe coders who actually ship
134 followers
The marketplace for vibe coders. Build your reputation through streaks, proof of work, and shipping projects consistently.
Free
Launch Team / Built With
Render: Get up to $100K in startup creditsThe fastest way to launch and scale your startup in the cloud
Promoted
How about quality of design? So much vibe coding is simply templatized..
@michael_mort Good point, that's actually something we're working on. Right now we track project quality scores based on live URLs, tech stack, and build complexity. Planning to add design evaluation as a signal too. The goal is to surface builders who ship polished products, not just code.
Streak and live URLs show who's consistent, but how do you tell quality apart? Tons of projects are technically "live" but held together with duct tape. Does the vibe score look at activity only, or does it factor in stuff like uptime or actual users?
@vibewrenchGood question! We go beyond just activity. Every project with a GitHub repo gets an automated quality analysis, we check for test suites, CI/CD pipelines, README quality, code structure, and commit history. Projects also get a quality score badge visible on their card. Live URLs are checked for actual uptime too. The vibe score itself combines project quality (weighted heaviest since it's hardest to fake), client outcomes, tech breadth, consistency, activity, and reputation. So someone with a duct-tape project and a high streak will still score lower than someone with well tested, properly structured code. We're also adding peer endorsements so other builders can vouch for quality.
@abhinav71 Nice, the weighted quality score approach makes a lot of sense — especially penalizing duct-tape projects despite high activity. Curious to see how peer endorsements play out once that's live.
@vibewrench it's already live now, are you using vibe talent now?
we've hired a few contractors for features.vote over the years and the evaluation process is always the same mess. going off portfolios and github stars with no real signal on whether someone will actually ship.
the streak + proof of work angle here is exactly the missing signal. bookmarked.
@gabrielpineda Thanks Gabriel! That's exactly the frustration we built VibeTalent to solve, portfolios and GitHub stars don't tell you if someone actually ships consistently. The hire feature is already live, just visit any builder's profile, hit the Hire button, and send them a message directly. No middleman, no fees. You can filter builders by streak length, badge level, and vibe score on the Explore page to find the most consistent shippers. Would love to hear how it goes if you try hiring through it!
Does this mean, regular coders can't participate in this? and how do you define vibecoder unless they define themselves as vibecoder?
@nayan_surya98 yes, all coders are able to participate. real coders also vibe code rn
A developer marketplace built around actual shipping velocity rather than self-reported skills is the right signal ngl. Resumes tell you what someone claims to know and GitHub stars tell you if one project got attention once. The vibe score weighting project quality highest because its "hardest to fake" is the right instinct. I'd want to know if the automated quality analysis flags repos that are technically live but have no error handling and were basically abandoned after the first deploy, that pattern shows up a lot in vibe-coded projects.
Finding design contractors where the signal is consistent shipped work with live URLs is a better starting point than a curated portfolio PDF tbh. Portfolios are selection-biased toward the three best projects and tell you nothing about what it's like to work with someone under timeline pressure. The quality scoring that checks for CI/CD and readme structure is useful for engineer profiles but I'd want to know how it evaluates design-heavy portfolios where the output is a Figma file or a live marketing site rather than a repo.