Hey Hunters, I know that user feedback is very important when building a product, especially for startups. The problem is, I m still figuring out the best way to collect it effectively.
Right now, I m debating between:
Email: Sending out direct emails to users. But how should I structure them? Short & casual or more structured surveys? In-App: Using a widget or pop-up inside the app. But where and when is the best moment to ask? Feedback Tools: There are so many. Which ones are actually worth it?
A lot of us tend to neglect our health, being so entrenched in the work we're doing. That's unfortunate because without health, we can't really do much. It should be prioritized above all.
Prioritizing health starts with simple habits. Personally, exercising even just 45 minutes a day (usually in the morning) - whether that's lifting weights or shooting hoops has greatly improved my posture, energy levels, confidence, and mental clarity. It sounds cliche, but I really do believe exercising is a super-enhancer. What is one healthy habit that has yielded improvements for you?
Yesterday, @zaczuo shared an idea about delivering packages from space. To me, that seems quite sci-fi and financially demanding to actually pull off. Today, I m reading that Bezos predicts millions of people could be living in space by 2050.
How realistic is this scenario, given that the last time we set foot on the Moon was more than 50 years ago? (And above all, I feel like we still can t solve basic problems on Earth, let alone expand into space.)
I work with startup teams and use AI tools almost every day for writing, research, support, and more. It saves a lot of time, no doubt. But there are still things AI just can t do well.
For example, when reading customer feedback, AI often misses the real meaning behind the words, like when someone sounds polite but is actually unhappy. Or when making product decisions, AI can list pros and cons, but it doesn t really understand the bigger picture or timing like a human would.
What would you choose: to create a product that will undoubtedly improve the lives of millions of people, but with no guarantee of commercial success, or to create a product that is obviously super commercially successful, but has no real utility?
A company and a proprietor are inseparable. Their liabilities and assets are tied together. but as a company grows, it the leadership becomes more and more diversified. Now there are directors, investors, big names who are separable from the company. Many a times if the proprietor is a known businessman the business will take off almost immediately. Investors will be willing to pour millions into research. Media houses will cover everything and a lot of capable people will start applying. Many a times startups don't have that luxury. All they have to show for themselves is a good product. But all it takes is an already established company to see your idea. They have all the manpower to replicate it and have distribution channels that will push their product in the blink of an eye. An established player has the balance sheet, the engineering bench, and the captive audience to clone your core feature in a quarter and bundle it to 50,000 existing customers by next Tuesday.
It feels like an impossible game. For founders who launched without an audience or big backing: how did you survive the clone threat?
Kind of struggling to figure out how to pitch my site wacht.tv, usually I just say its Reddit meets MTV. Maybe I'm overthinking it but I rarely see X meets Y as a tagline.
The world has changed rapidly over the past two decades with the internet, new technologies and the accelerated transfer of information.
Anyone not actively working online or in IT may have trouble keeping up with these "tech trends." This is especially true for older generations who did not have the opportunity to grow up with computers as it is today.
Good morning fellow Hunters!
I m having a low-energy morning.
Was wandering, what makes you keep going when things get rough, and don t go your way? Please, do share.