Migma AI - AI runs your email marketing. Better with every send.

@danielboardman Thanks, really appreciate that 🙌

Your clients can keep Zoho, GoHighLevel, or their current CRM as the core system. Contacts are imported or synced into Migma through native integrations, connected ESPs, or API/webhooks, depending on the setup.

So there’s no need to move the rest of their operations. Migma handles the campaign workflow, while the CRM stays the main source of truth.

Would love for you to try it with one of your client setups and tell us how the workflow feels.

@talhakhalidmtk Nice question! Migma already has quality and deliverability standards built in from day one. On top of that, there's a layer that checks how your past campaigns performed, and it keeps getting sharper the more you send.

Fewer sends means less for it to learn from, so the real gains show up once you're sending consistently and it locks into your brand and audience.

Come give it a try 📬

@philip_sorensen Thanks Philip! Let’s keep the big ones uncomfortable 😄

@1mirul Thanks so much! Cutting context switching was a big part of the design, glad it comes through.

@greggblanchard Migma <3 SendView thanks a lot for your support.

@greggblanchard Thanks so much! Means a lot coming from someone who gets both sides of it.

Come take it for a spin.

@adriancia Thanks 🙏 You landed on exactly why we built it that way. One-shot generators feel like magic for about ten seconds, then you hit the thing you want to change and you're stuck regenerating and praying.

Starting from a real reference gets you 90% there, and keeping full control of every element means the last 10%, the part that actually makes it yours, is a quick tweak instead of a fight.

Would love for you to take it for a spin and see how it feels on your own brand.

@felipe_messias Thanks 🙏 And yeah, Outlook is the exact reason Zinn exists.

The short version: you're not writing HTML, you're writing Zinn, and our engine compiles it down to whatever each client needs to render it right. Outlook's quirks get handled at that compile step automatically, so the person building the email never has to think about them. Outlook 2003 included.

I'll keep the how-it-works under the hood to ourselves 😄 but that compile layer is the whole reason we built our own markup instead of patching raw HTML forever.

Best way to judge it is to throw a nasty layout at it and open the result in Outlook yourself.

@rogerdemello Thanks 🎉 Good question, this is exactly the failure mode you'd worry about.

Two things keep it honest. The models are trained on Zinn specifically, so it's the default they reach for, not something they translate into after thinking in HTML. And there's a validation step on the way out: anything that isn't valid Zinn gets caught and corrected before it ever becomes an email, so drift can't silently ship. Complexity doesn't sneak past because the output has to pass that gate every time.

I'll keep the deeper mechanics to ourselves 😄 but that's the shape of it: trained to speak Zinn natively, and validated so it can't drift into something else without getting caught.

@rich_sun It's not one thing, that's the honest answer. A few pieces stack up.

First, the quality of the email itself. Our engine isn't spitting out generic templates, it studied thousands of real high-performing emails, and it scores every one it makes across five things: tone, visual, emotional pull, clarity, and how well it carries your brand's values. So what goes out is already built to convert, not just to look nice.

Second, deliverability. The same email renders identically across Gmail, Outlook, Apple Mail, dark mode, mobile, all of it, and it actually lands in the inbox. An email that reaches people and looks right everywhere gets opened and clicked way more than one that breaks or hits spam.

Put those together and the lift is real. Best way to believe it is to run one of your own campaigns through it and watch the numbers.

@mutugantan82154  Really appreciate that, especially coming from someone who'd notice 🙏
The calendar logic was one of those "boring but critical" pieces we didn't want to cut corners on.

Go poke around the campaign calendar if you haven't yet, curious what you'd throw at it