Sherlock - Stop AI-assisted cheating in remote interviews

@maxcomx Great question IMO candidates typically fall into four buckets based on capability and confidence: 1. High capability, high confidence 2. High capability, low confidence 3. Low capability, high confidence 4. Low capability, low confidence Now here’s the reality: High-capability, low-confidence candidates often feel pressure to perform and can get swayed into using AI cheating tools just to “level the playing field.” These are good candidates who deserve the job, but in trying to boost their chances, they end up crossing ethical lines - sometimes unknowingly. Sherlock helps here by keeping the process fair and making sure they rely on their true skills, not shortcuts. In the long run, it benefits them because they land roles where they can actually succeed and grow. Low-capability candidates - whether confident or not - often use these tools too, but they either get caught (thanks to Sherlock), or worse, get through and struggle on the job, hurting both themselves and the employer. What’s more concerning is that even high-capability candidates today are tempted by the flood of AI tools in the market, often without the initial intention to cheat. The pressure to get a job is real, and tools that promise “an edge” are persuasive. That’s why Sherlock exists - not just to catch cheating, but to protect the integrity of hiring and help great candidates win on merit, not manipulation.