Sherlock - Stop AI-assisted cheating in remote interviews
by•
Sherlock is an AI-agent that stops AI-assisted cheating during remote interviews. Sherlock ensures interview integrity by detecting AI-assisted cheating through vision, hearing, and reasoning— letting you focus on quality conversations.
Replies
Best
Very thoughtful name and logo — great product! I'm not currently hiring, but I’ve heard from many people that cheating is a real concern in online interviews. Especially as a startup, you don’t want to risk hiring the wrong team. I’ll definitely share this with my friends.
You're spot on - we've heard similar concerns from early-stage teams, and that's been a big motivation behind building Sherlock. It's all about helping companies make confident, high-trust hires, even remotely.
Really appreciate you thinking of sharing it with your friends!
@skabhi Big congratulations to the team behind Sherlock! In an era where AI tools are everywhere, it's amazing to see an AI that actually protects integrity rather than compromising it. This is a huge step forward for fair hiring practices—well done!
Report
@smrati_tiwari4 Thank you so much. That’s exactly what we set out to do - use AI to protect what actually matters. We’re just getting started!
@aryansharma17 We’ve already added a free plan so you can try Sherlock out. Feel free to explore it and let us know what you think - we’d love your feedback.
This is crazy good! 🔥 It feels like a game-changer for remote hiring—vision, hearing and reasoning? That’s next level. Also, the intro video was clean. I am curious, what video editing tool did you use to make it? Or did you hire someone for it?
Report
@lakshya_singh Thank you! Really glad you liked the product and the video. We worked with a team to bring it to life - they did a great job capturing what Sherlock is all about.
This is gonna be a mandatory tool in interviews moving forward.
Report
@aswin_kumar Appreciate that! That's exactly what we're aiming for. Making trust a natural part of every remote interview.
Report
Proctoring tools often feel clunky or intrusive, but this looks clean, focused, and thoughtfully designed. Love how you’ve blended live session visibility with actionable insights. Can’t wait to see how this evolves—huge win for teams that care about integrity and user experience.
Report
@neha_nk1 Thanks a lot. We’ve tried to keep Sherlock simple and useful without getting in the way. Glad it comes across that way. Really appreciate the kind words and support.
@skabhiHow does Sherlock distinguish between benign behaviors (e.g., a candidate glancing at notes) and malicious AI cheating—especially as tools like AR glasses or background apps blur the line? For instance, if a candidate uses a secondary device off-camera to query ChatGPT, how does the system infer this without invasive screen monitoring? Are detection models trained on real-world cheating tactics, and is there a feedback loop for interviewers to flag false alarms?
Replies
Very thoughtful name and logo — great product! I'm not currently hiring, but I’ve heard from many people that cheating is a real concern in online interviews. Especially as a startup, you don’t want to risk hiring the wrong team. I’ll definitely share this with my friends.
@harshrawat Thank you, that truly means a lot.
You're spot on - we've heard similar concerns from early-stage teams, and that's been a big motivation behind building Sherlock. It's all about helping companies make confident, high-trust hires, even remotely.
Really appreciate you thinking of sharing it with your friends!
Dot Copilot
@skabhi Big congratulations to the team behind Sherlock! In an era where AI tools are everywhere, it's amazing to see an AI that actually protects integrity rather than compromising it. This is a huge step forward for fair hiring practices—well done!
@smrati_tiwari4 Thank you so much. That’s exactly what we set out to do - use AI to protect what actually matters. We’re just getting started!
Product Hunt Dark Screen
I would ask for some free credits!
@aryansharma17 We’ve already added a free plan so you can try Sherlock out. Feel free to explore it and let us know what you think - we’d love your feedback.
https://www.withsherlock.ai/
AI interview vs Anti-AI interview. The match begins!
@thefullstack We’re not here to fight AI. We’re here to protect real skill :)
VenEx
Much needed! Thank you for creating this
@avi_agr Thanks so much! Hearing this makes all the effort totally worth it.
As a developer, this proctoring tool is vital! 😄
@shenjun Thank you so much! Hearing that from a developer really means a lot.
Jupitrr AI
This is crazy good! 🔥 It feels like a game-changer for remote hiring—vision, hearing and reasoning? That’s next level. Also, the intro video was clean. I am curious, what video editing tool did you use to make it? Or did you hire someone for it?
@lakshya_singh Thank you! Really glad you liked the product and the video. We worked with a team to bring it to life - they did a great job capturing what Sherlock is all about.
Bullet.so - Build websites from Notion
@aswin_kumar Appreciate that! That's exactly what we're aiming for. Making trust a natural part of every remote interview.
Proctoring tools often feel clunky or intrusive, but this looks clean, focused, and thoughtfully designed. Love how you’ve blended live session visibility with actionable insights. Can’t wait to see how this evolves—huge win for teams that care about integrity and user experience.
@neha_nk1 Thanks a lot. We’ve tried to keep Sherlock simple and useful without getting in the way. Glad it comes across that way. Really appreciate the kind words and support.
Elisi : AI-powered Goal Management App
@skabhi How does Sherlock distinguish between benign behaviors (e.g., a candidate glancing at notes) and malicious AI cheating—especially as tools like AR glasses or background apps blur the line? For instance, if a candidate uses a secondary device off-camera to query ChatGPT, how does the system infer this without invasive screen monitoring? Are detection models trained on real-world cheating tactics, and is there a feedback loop for interviewers to flag false alarms?