... Gemini the question a buyer would ask. "What are the best tools for X?" Then see whether you are in the answer, and who is. Two things we keep seeing: The three disagree a lot. A product ChatGPT names happily can be absent from Claude entirely. The same question a week later returns a different list, so one check is a snapshot, not a verdict. What I'm curious about: has anyone changed something on their site (llms.txt, a comparison ...

... platform numbers? - Which part eats the most time for you? - What has broken silently and how long did it take to notice? I will read every reply, and if you drop a site that breaks tracking tools, I will happily point the scanner at it and tell you what it finds. Thanks in advance, guys ...

... teammate already tried months ago and closed the PR on. It has no way to know, because git only keeps what got merged. Every rejected attempt, and the reason it was rejected, just isn't there. So the agent happily walks into the same wall. The reasoning behind a codebase (why the timeout is 30, why an approach got dropped) lives in closed PRs and reviews nobody reads again. Your agent ...

... security tool trustworthy. Makes total sense that the write is unconditional otherwise you'd have to build a whole separate 'is this repo clean' system just to decide when to record. The trade-off you described (false positives vs silent baseline) feels like the right one. Already using it on a few internal repos, and the speed is genuinely impressive. Thanks for the detailed breakdown this thread alone has been more educational than most tool docs I've read this ... ... just starts everything fresh... tbh the sharp edge is the flip side of the thing you liked: the write is unconditional, so scanning a repo while it is already compromised makes that the baseline, and the next scan would happily

... reasons and the billing benefit came along free. The catch in shape one deserves a name: the executor has to know it's stuck, and that self-knowledge is itself a capability. In their measurements, a pairing that consulted happily at default effort dropped to almost never consulting when the executor's effort was lowered and then scored below the executor running alone. You saved money on the worker, and the worker stopped raising its hand. Two more honest notes ...

... enough to complain about. Ours in Zeplik was the model picker swapping mid conversation without saying so. Nobody filed a ticket for it. People assumed the AI was just having an off day, which is a story users will happily tell themselves forever. The fix felt wrong to ship. We made the picker say out loud that it swapped and why, which is basically admitting we changed something behind your back. Shipped it three weeks ...

... failed to fix for two entire weeks. I fell hopelessly in love. Of course, my promises to my wife kept shifting... "By April, I swear..." "Okay, June for sure..." "Seriously, August is the final deadline..." Meanwhile, I was happily burning through expensive LLM models and API credits as an unemployed guy. Before I knew it, I had blown nearly $25,000... (My wife's affection dropped straight to absolute zero a few times, but I somehow managed to thaw ...

... picking the one i liked the look of. one thing id say against my own answer though: this only works if you can take the no. we lost a whole category of people who would have happily used it for free, and some of them were the ones i most wanted in the room ...

... Oshenye(@oshylabs): A knowledge graph solves retrieval, not the junk drawer problem you are describing. The failure is not that memory is hard to search, it is that nobody knows whether a memory is still true. A graph will happily retrieve last month's client requirement three months after the client changed their mind, fast and structured, which makes it worse rather than better because structure makes it look authoritative. What I would want is less abstraction and more expiry ...

... answers higher, it prefers whichever option it saw first, and it quietly prefers text written in its own style. Use it to triage, never as the final word on anything that matters. A judge with a length bias will happily tell you your more verbose, worse version is the better one. I'll say the harder part, because I build on the wrong side of this. Murror is an AI companion for understanding your own emotions, and there ...

... normal to get contacted by someone selling upvotes @ $2/vote? From the actual email: "$2/upvote. Growth: $499 250 upvotes, 50 comments, 25 reviews, 10 followers (20% off). " Needless to say, I will never do this but will happily name & shame the sender ...

... code now. It is faster than me and it does not get bored. Three things I still do myself. I read the actual error message before I paste it anywhere. I decide what not to build, because AI will happily build anything you describe and never once ask whether it should exist. And I do the last pass before something ships, because on mobile you cannot quietly push a fix afterwards. None of that is because ...

... source repos, and I noticed a scary gap: You git clone a project, you point an agent at it, and before you type a single command , code can already run. A .git/hooks/pre commit, an npm postinstall, a .envrc, a VS Code task set to folderOpen, a CLAUDE.md that tells the agent to curl | bash none of these show up in a normal diff review. Your agent will happily

... startup legal templates. You pick one and start asking questions immediately. No file, no upload, no account required to look. The bet is that the first thirty seconds should demonstrate value rather than request it, and that people will happily bring their own material afterwards. Too early for me to claim it worked. Follows are up, and whether that turns into people uploading their own documents is the number I'm actually watching. What I didn't expect ...

... Since agents will happily rebuild anything you ask in minutes, "I'm afraid to touch this" stops meaning what it used to. But I don't think the fear goes away, it just moves. I keep a section in my CLAUDE.md that isn't architecture notes, it's just "already tried this, here's why it didn't work." Without it the agent will quietly rebuild the same mistake in 3 months, because it has no memory of the first ...

... inference for an edtech company, I trained in sociology and religious studies (PhD-track program). I built Nexus Humanum because I got tired of AI tools inventing citations. Ask ChatGPT for a lecture or lit review and it'll happily cite a paper that doesn't exist plausible author, plausible journal, zero real DOI. Funny enough, GPTZero just found 100 of these hallucinated citations in papers accepted at NeurIPS itself, so it's not just me being paranoid about this ...

... where mail can finally go somewhere. Skim has happily read your folders since forever, but putting a message into one? Not supported. Slightly awkward for an email client. Fixed. New Move to folder new toolbar button, or V / Ctrl+K for a palette-style picker. Type, hit Enter, done. Create a folder while moving no folder named "Taxes" yet? Type it, it gets created and the mail lands in it. Works offline too, because of course the move rides ...

... live on both stores. It reads your Google Calendar, watches live traffic & parking, and pings you at the exact minute to leave. The road here: 3 App Store rejections (localization details), one completely broken build that Google happily approved, and a two-week review marathon. iOS: https://apps.apple.com/app/never... Android: https://play.google.com/store/ap... Update: the early-bird list is closed. What's next: we're opening 50 free beta seats for Pro+ , the upcoming server-powered tier. The live ...

... there's no shared webhooks folder they both sit under. so the glob fix doesn't even apply to the three i have today, they were never colocated in the first place. which proves your enumeration vs property point before i even get to a fourth provider. the property i actually care about isn't "is this file in the webhooks directory," it's "does this handler get called by an external party with money attached to the payload ... ... nothing, the reviewer's normal experience becomes an empty screen, and empty screens train people to expect empty. Whether the one that is not empty gets read properly on day forty is an open question. It still beats the alternative

... technical knowledge. Your data. Your infrastructure. Your rules. https://www.thesecondbrain.dev We are live on Product Hunt today: https://www.producthunt.com/post... Where do you draw the line on what context you are comfortable storing with a third party versus keeping under your own control? Comment from Gal Dayan(@galdayan): @rahilpirani  fair enough, honest answer beats a confident guess. sounds like the takeaway either way is "export regularly and don't rely on the platform's cleanup behavior to save ... ... your-data is the right principle but I wonder how many people who'd benefit most from it will actually go set up their own Cloudflare account and keep it running. the security-conscious devs will do it happily

... work. Faster in theory. Except I come back to one of three things. It finished 30 minutes ago and I wasted the half hour. Or it sat waiting on a yes/no I never saw. Or the fun one, it happily ran something I would never have approved. The more agents I run in parallel, the worse this gets. Babysitting three terminals is impossible. Trusting three terminals blindly is worse. So I want to know where everyone else draws the line ... ... Ghani(@aadilghani): @virko_kask   Agent-state instead of task-type as the urgency signal is better than what I had, and I think you just moved my whole priority model. Category decides if it may reach me, idle-vs

... doing before and what changed" lands in their inbox as homework. The people with the best stories are usually the least likely to write three paragraphs about your extension, because it's your marketing, not theirs. Same person will happily talk for five minutes though. So ask them to say it rather than write it. A link they can talk into whenever suits them, no scheduling, and you do the writing up after. Then you're editing instead of begging ...

... clearer growth + messaging (Nuriye, erafettin, Brandon, Yakup), easier quit + a cleaner goodbye (Mohammad Faisal). And the things you told me to protect the rain that sends your pet home, local-only with no account, the fact that it's happily useless those aren't going anywhere. Still on my list: a one-click "share my Tamamon" card, the deeper earned-growth design, and a few more Warmthfolk. If there's something you wish it did, this thread is still ...

... under your control. There s a fully-featured 15-day free trial on the Microsoft Store. I d genuinely appreciate feedback on: UI/UX onboarding missing features performance anything confusing If community suggestions make it into future builds, I ll happily credit contributors in the changelog/about section. Microsoft Store: https://apps.microsoft.com/detai... Thanks for checking it out and helping an indie developer grow ...

... machine-executable contract . README + Makefile + CI + setup.sh are usually descriptive and often inconsistent. `ota.yaml` defines: what ready means, which task is authoritative for each path, what checks must pass, what can be run and in what order, what safe versus risky actions are, what output/receipts prove it worked. For a human, better docs can help. For an AI agent, that only helps if the signal is deterministic. Ota s difference is the same info is made explicit as structured inputs ... ... machine-readable receipt for automation/CI. So Ota is about replacing guesswork with contract-governed execution , not replacing docs. Comment from Ghost Kitty(@ghost-kitty-9996917): Comment Deleted Comment from Gal Dayan(@galdayan): the drift-detection answers above cover contract vs