Paperguide AI Writer - Easily write well researched articles & academic papers

Congratulations to the team on the launch of Paperguide AI Writer! 🎉 This looks like a game-changer for writers and researchers. Wishing you all the success in empowering creators with smarter tools. Looking forward to trying it out! @roopreddy @mallikarjun_reddy3

@roopreddy @mallikarjun_reddy3 @sukhmani_kaur123 @satyaranjan1999 , congratulations all of you for the launch 🎉️

seems very interesting!! cannot wait to check it out

I hope that your terms were not written by an actual attorney, because boy does it make no sense when applied. I have a lot of unique fieldwork (in the vein of James C. Scott, et al) about the governance, economy, and challenges faced by splinter de facto independent nation-state-level entities in Myanmar, like the Wa and Shan states. But like any responsible person should, I read your ToS and do not believe that I'm able to even use your service for a myriad of reasons, including: a) What is "any illegal purpose"? The government of Myanmar considers my presence in these de facto areas illegal. I had to obviously find lodging, eat, spend some money - which, knowingly or not (and honestly who knows, it's a cash society at the time), that money may have gone to the production of heroin - this was before the more recent meth boom - which means that by the truthfulness of my research implicates me in some jurisdiction - more than one - of aiding and abetting, at least in theory, narcoterrorism by local authority and narcotics trafficking. It's a stretch, sure, but people have been convicted on less. Americans aren't allowed in to these enclaves, but I was not an American passport holder then and there are upsides and downsides to that. The upside is obviously access, but the downside is that I could not ask Yangon for help if and when (and it was a 'when') hostilities restarted. The whole point though, is that there was no functional legitimate government in place, therefore the jurisdictional matter has a definitive answer and it is definitely not "any". Nor is is Alpharetta, Georgia, btw. They lack the jurisdiction to even consider things like human rights violations, or even copyright infringement. If you simply sever these parts of the boilerplate it opens the opposite can of worms. And more recent events and tech opens up more questions. OFAC literally sanctioned a smart contract deployed on the EVM chain before pretending as if they didn't and made up some clearly problematic (1st Amendment, hello?) charges to the makers of one front end. TornadoCash is still on chain because it is there, period. Nodes are literally all over the world anbd synchronized because permissionless means permissionless. How does one write a paper about the legalities of the issue when some agency has personal and subject matter jurisdiction but in a clearly unconstitutionally applicable manner, as it clearly failed to appreciate how the blockchain even operates. These are things that lawyers lose sleep over, and different lawyers in the same field differ according to their technical and constitutional expertise in addition to the facts. If the basics of your ToS can't clarify boundaries to the extent where I can even put my data and analysis and methodology otno your platform (which also fails to mention how you may handle my potentially proprietary code that, unless I'm linking to a repo, you don't know what I've licensed it as, or if I am even able to license it as.) These are not trivial questions. I signed up to support innovation, but hopefully that money goes to someone who is able to draft at the very least a ToS that is enforceable and actually makes sense. Much larger companies have failed at this before, but the NY Times, who sent me a DMCA notice that managed to admit to two criminal acts that are so narrow that I'm legitimately impressed that they managed to hit both of them (perjury via misrepresentation of their relationshiip to the rights of the material asserted, and attempted intrusion of my computer system when they could have just read the CC0 code and find that they had no claim, period). They also don't need me as a client, but since I would like to read articles on The Athletic, I still am. I don't think you have that kind of leverage yet. And if this sounds nitpicky, well, nitpicking puts people behind bars every day, so I'll err on the side of the needle instead of the haystack, thanks.

Congrats on the launch @roopreddy .

@satyaranjan1999 Loved paperguide it is a great product for writing articles and other materials that takes a lot of work and time my question is what are the ways it will output like humans and not generate generic AI materials.

Love that the tool includes a built-in plagiarism checker—it gives me peace of mind knowing my work is original. Any chance it integrates with tools like Grammarly? That could really enhance its functionality!

This is really hepful

Neat

Congratulations @roopreddy Congratulations @roopreddy on launching Paperguide AI Writer for the second time! Your innovative tool stands out as an excellent choice for academic writing and literature management.