What actually gets a product to the top of Product Hunt?
The market has never been this crowded. AI has made it possible to go from idea to shipped product in days which means Product Hunt is now flooded with launches every single week. More products, more noise, more competition for the same front page.
So I've been thinking about this a lot: what actually separates the products that make it to the top from the ones that quietly disappear by noon?
From where I sit as a builder, here's what I genuinely believe matters:
We stopped tracking daily active users and our product got better
For the first year of building Murror, DAU was the number we checked every morning. It was the first thing on our dashboard, the first metric in every team meeting, and the number we used to judge whether a feature was working.
Then one day we noticed something strange: our DAU was climbing, but our NPS was dropping. People were opening the app more often, but they were less happy with it. Some of our most engaged users were showing signs of what we started calling "compulsive checking" opening Murror out of habit rather than intention.
Why your AI product's biggest competitor is not another AI product
When we first started building Murror, I spent a lot of time studying other AI wellness apps. I tracked their features, analyzed their onboarding flows, and mapped out where we could differentiate. I thought our competitive advantage would come from being smarter, faster, or more accurate than them.
I was completely wrong about where the real competition was.
Our biggest competitor was never another AI product. It was the user doing nothing. It was the journal sitting unopened on the nightstand. It was the therapy appointment that kept getting rescheduled. It was the voice in someone's head saying "I will deal with this later."
The moment we understood this, our entire product strategy shifted. We stopped optimizing for feature comparisons and started optimizing for the moment of emotional resistance that split second when someone feels something difficult and has to choose between sitting with it or pushing it away.
What have you been able to build with AI as a non-technical person?
Before AI, I always thought I would NEVER learn how to code. I genuinely admired technical people, watching them code felt like watching magic. I remember wishing that maybe one day, I could do something like that too.
I ve never had any formal education in programming, and I had zero experience building apps. But with AI, I was able to start from just an idea and slowly figure things out on my own experimenting, setting things up, and eventually creating my first interface that I could actually interact with.
It honestly felt magical. It made me realize how fast the world is changing. Coding is no longer something completely out of reach. AI is making it possible for people like me to turn ideas in our heads into real, tangible drafts for the first time.
Content created by you or decided by AI, which one is higher quality?
While building a product, I ve also been trying to run content on social media to bring in more traffic. I experimented with creating AI-generated characters and producing UGC-style videos around them.
During this process, I realized something interesting: there are hundreds of tools that can generate virtual characters and UGC-style videos. But what actually makes a video engaging isn t the tool - it s the authenticity of the person creating the content.
🌿 How did you welcome the first day of 2026?
Happy New Year, everyone. How did you spend the first day of 2026?
For me, the first day of a new year feels like the opening step of a long journey. So instead of rushing into productivity, I chose to begin 2026 by taking care of both my body and my inner world.
Here s how my Day One looked:
An early morning run, pushed myself 1km further to reach 7km
Wrote down all my goals for the year, both personal and professional
Repotted my flowering plant into a new pot
Cooked a nutritious meal for myself with Stranger Things series
Started reading a new book
Cleaned and reset my living space
The AI feature your users actually want is not the one you think
Every AI product I see launching right now is racing to add the most impressive, most complex AI feature they can build. Autonomous agents. Multi-step reasoning. Real-time analysis of everything.
When we started building Murror, we fell into the same trap. We wanted to build the smartest emotional AI possible. Something that could analyze patterns across months of conversations, predict emotional states, generate deep psychological insights.
We let AI write our code for a week. Here is what actually happened.
Everyone is talking about vibe coding right now. Let AI handle the code while you focus on the vision. It sounds revolutionary. So we tried it.
For one week, our team at Murror used AI coding tools for everything. New features, bug fixes, refactoring. We wanted to see if it could genuinely speed up our development cycle or if the hype was getting ahead of reality.
What helps you become a CEO? Start by asking questions.
In the past, my thoughts were often stuck in small, daily things like:
Is there any drama on Facebook today?
Did anyone like my story?
Did my crush drop any hints?
Is anyone asking me out today?
Does my best friend have new stories to tell me?
Looking back, I can t help but laugh at myself. None of these thoughts really helped me grow, yet they always gave me that emotional, butterfly-in-the-stomach feeling.
Everything started to change when I entered a phase of I don t even know who I am.
And that s when I began searching for real answers.
Nobody talks about the products that survived because they shipped slow.
The builder internet has one dominant religion: ship fast, learn fast, iterate. And honestly? It's mostly right. I'm not here to argue against iteration.
But I've been noticing a pattern in products that actually lasted and it's uncomfortable: A lot of them were embarrassingly slow at the start. Not because the founders were lazy but because they were obsessive about the wrong thing to ship first.
Figma spent years just making the multiplayer cursor work flawlessly before talking about anything else. Notion had a tiny, nearly unusable v1 that they kept showing the same 500 people. Linear said no to mobile for two years while everyone said they were crazy.

