Connect with the Product Hunt community

I ve worked in investing and trading since 2008, and one problem has followed me throughout that time: investors have access to more data than ever, but turning that data into a clear decision remains difficult.

That s why I built Stocks 2 Buy, a platform designed to help investors:

You can now connect content sources to your localization engines in Studio, translate content with your team's glossary, rules, and brand voice, and write translations back to your repositories, CMSs, or help centers.

Connect GitHub, Payload CMS, or Zendesk Help Center, or submit content through the CLI and API. Each source uses the localization engine you choose, with your team's glossary, rules, and brand voice. Product and content teams submit content from their own tools, while the localization team runs the localization infrastructure.

The CLI. Engineers use lingo push to submit source files through the localization engine's configured pipeline. lingo pull writes the completed translations to local target files on the same machine and checkout. Studio lists each submission with its status by language.

The GitHub App. When source files change on the default branch, the app translates the changes and opens a pull request with the translated files. Enable the pull request workflow to commit translations directly to a pull request branch. Require approval before automatic runs, or use /lingo translate to request specific files and languages.

Hey Product Hunt!

We launched ChatRecall.dev last week to stop AI context from evaporating between sessions. Since then, we ve realised the chat logs themselves hold the exact architectural blueprint developers and teams are constantly losing.

Whenever an agent builds software, it makes dozens of micro-decisions and cuts corners ("we'll fix this later") that immediately get lost once the prompt session ends.

Your app is online, the main flow works, and you want to step away for the weekend.

What would you check before closing the laptop?

We d love to hear what you think about the product.

If you have a minute, please check it out, leave an upvote, and share your feedback. Every bit of support means a lot to the team.
https://www.producthunt.com/prod...

Hey all, spent today chasing a bug where Tipword would sometimes just do nothing when you hover a word. Some of you probably hit it. It was random and hard to catch, but I think I got it.

What s fixed:

• Chrome: words inside scrollable areas (like Gmail or chat apps) didn t translate at all. They do now

• Chrome: sometimes it translated the first word of the line instead of the word under your pointer. Fixed

• Buttons and labels with more than one word now translate the word you re actually pointing at, not the whole label

• The language picker closed by itself right after a fresh launch. It stays open now

The supply-chain scan used to work one repository at a time, from the dashboard. If a worm had pushed an implant into one of your 90 repos, you'd have had to open them one by one to find out.

Now one command does the round:

There are plenty of event calendars out there, but most just tell you when and where something is happening.

As a founder, that's only half the information you actually need.

What I wanted to know was:

• Which investors actually attend?

• Is the event relevant to my startup's stage and industry?

• Can I apply to pitch, and what could I win?

• Are there discounted or free startup passes?

• Is it worth spending a few days and potentially thousands of euros attending?

As teams ship faster with AI coding assistants (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.), the volume of PRs has skyrocketed. But the time engineers spend reviewing code hasn't scaled at all.

I've seen two sides to this lately:

1. Teams where PRs sit in queue for 2 3 days, creating a massive pipeline bottleneck.

2. Teams trying AI reviewers, but ending up with automated spam comments that nobody reads.

I m curious how your team handles this:

Hey everyone

We've been working hard on ShellMate, and we've made some big improvements in v3.

Vitals is live on Product Hunt today. It's an Activity Monitor alternative for Mac that shows you 60 apps instead of 1,000 processes, and in its first week, close to 830 licenses have sold. This is the story of why I built it, how it works, and why I think it's the best way to see what your Mac is actually doing.

Last month, we finally got a demo with a massive prospect a 500-person company that was exactly our target audience. The demo went perfectly. The VP of Product loved our tool, and the team was ready to sign a $1,500/month contract.

Then, the deal moved to their IT and Security department.

Solving a real problem isn't always enough if the user has to consciously remember to log in every time.

We had a tool that worked brilliantly on paper but because it wasn't tied to a daily trigger people completely forgot about it after a few days.

How do you cross the line from a useful utility app into something people open every single day without thinking?

Hi everyone, Takahiro here. Chronock brings Google Calendar and Outlook together with scheduling links and automatic event copying.

I m deciding how long a free trial should last, and I keep coming back to how often someone actually needs the product.

Seven days can mean seven chances to get value from a daily tool. For something used in a weekly meeting, it might mean just one.

My background is in sales management. When you agree on a coaching action with someone, the value doesn t end with that conversation. You need to follow up the next week and see whether anything changed.

That s why I m leaning toward 30 days for the product I m building. It gives people a chance to experience several weekly cycles.

Hello! Thank you all for the support with our launch today.
I know a lot of you follow OpenSEO from our launch back in July.
If you've been using the product and you enjoy it, a review would help a bunch:
https://www.producthunt.com/prod...
I just learned that Product Hunt has "Best SEO Tool" Style listicles and its based on reviews more than anything else.
Curious if we can get by and get AI mentions just from Product Hunt instead of asking people to click through those super long G2 / Trustpilot reviews.
Anyways, figured I would ask + let me know if you've all had success getting reviews some other way.
Appreciate it!

reading the end of software engineering paper (arxiv 2606.05608). its own benchmark has agents above 80% on one-off tasks and at most 38% when they maintain a codebase over time, because early mistakes carry forward. writing code got cheap, keeping a system correct didnt. feels like the real job is now writing intent down clearly and checking agent output with a different method than the one that wrote it. are you spending more time writing code or reviewing what agents wrote?

Whether you upvoted, commented, shared the launch, tried the product, or gave us feedback.

Getting tiun in front of thousands of founders and builders and finishing #2 for the entire month means a lot to us.

We're still early, and we're just getting started.

End of the week means looking back at what I planned vs what I actually did.

What tasks were completed, what wasn t, and what needs to move to next week.

I used to assign implementation tasks to teammates. Over the last months I've moved most of that to coding agents: once the requirements are confirmed, I press Enter and the agent implements it and runs the e2e tests. If I need proof, I tell it to capture screenshots as evidence and write a short report.

For me, explaining a task to an agent is easier than explaining it to a person and then re-checking the result. I used to think "one person, one project". Now one person can run several, as long as the requirements are written down clearly before anything is handed over.

What I keep doing myself: collecting incomplete requirements (meeting notes, client questions) as requests, and only handing one to the agent when it is complete. When the client changes something later, I add it as a change request on the same item so the agent gets the original context. The screenshot is my own list of such requests (sample data).

What I'm unsure about: this is my own opinion, not something I measured. Where do you draw the line? Which parts do you still give to a human (reviewing e2e results, client-facing decisions, ambiguous specs), and which do you trust an agent with end to end? Disclosure: I'm the maker of PMDesk, so I'm biased toward this workflow.

WOW Our first users were cooking since launch!

Below you can find some pictures of the products created during the last week of testing and the first days of our launch, and the outcome is amazing!

Check out the full 3D models, including the B-rep data, in the Library on our website!

But there is more. Autonomyware creates market-ready products. This includes the requirements, the risk analysis, the architecture, and everything a world-class engineering team would create.

A model has read your documents. Three agents fork that working memory and pursue different reasoning paths. One calls a tool and takes in new evidence while the others keep generating.

What does that look like under the hood?

Hey guys, super quick announcement ahead of tomorrow's launch - we've added MCP servers!
#1: Trophy Docs MCP
The Docs MCP gives agents always-up-to-date context on Trophy's features, integrations and guides, reducing hallucinations and enforcing best practices.
Ask your agent things like:
"What Trophy features should I use to increase user engagement?"
"How should I use Trophy to build habitual usage patterns?"
"Does Trophy support streak freezes?"
#2: Trophy Account MCP
The Account MCP gives AI agents access to your Trophy account helping you configure and deploy gamification features faster, without touching the dashboard.
Ask your agent things like:
"Set up a daily streak in Trophy that tracks completed workouts, give users 1 freeze to start with, and 1 new freeze every week. Set up a webhook endpoint to send users a guest pass when they hit a 30-day streak."
"Set up a repeating weekly leaderboard that ranks the top 100 users by XP. Award XP for reading notes, flipping flashcards and watching videos. Add a 2X XP boost on weekends for Pro users only."
"Create a series of achievements for 10, 25, 50, 100 donations. Reward users with increasing XP for hitting each level."

Get Connected

Connect Trophy's MCP servers to your favourite AI tools including Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex and any other AI client that supports the MCP protocol:

- Docs MCP: `https://docs.trophy.so/mcp`
- Account MCP: `https://mcp.trophy.so/mcp` (Trophy Account required)

Hey everyone,

Thank you for the upvotes, comments and questions on Ghostifier's launch, you all helped this launch exceed all of my expectations. We finished #9 for the day!

Yesterday (September 28th), we launched MCP Connectors by Databox, and you pushed it all the way to #1 Product of the Day. It's our first #1, and we couldn't have done it without you.

Huge thanks to the Databox team and to everyone here who upvoted, commented, asked the hard questions, and connected their first tool. You helped us confirm something we'd suspected for a while: knowing that a number moved isn't enough. People want to know why.

A few things we heard loud and clear: